Page 2 of 2

Re: Richard Sherman

Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 6:53 pm
by JohnTurney
JuggernautJ wrote:
JohnTurney wrote:
Do you happen to know the QB completion percentage from similar dates?
For Lane's era = 49.6% completion percentage
For Sherman's = 61.9%

Re: Richard Sherman

Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 7:54 pm
by JuggernautJ
JohnTurney wrote:
JuggernautJ wrote:
JohnTurney wrote:
Do you happen to know the QB completion percentage from similar dates?
For Lane's era = 49.6% completion percentage
For Sherman's = 61.9%
Thank you, John.
I remember the days when a 50% completion rate was considered "good."
Nowadays it's considered atrocious. How the game has changed...

Re: Richard Sherman

Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 8:35 pm
by JohnTurney
Here are some interesting analytics

Image

Re: Richard Sherman

Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 1:52 am
by Rupert Patrick
JohnTurney wrote:
JuggernautJ wrote:
JohnTurney wrote: Anyway, from 1952-65 6.2% of the passes were picked off

From 2011-2017 2.6% of the passes have been picked off
That's a pretty amazing statistical difference.
Do you happen to know the QB completion percentage from similar dates?
I bet it would be similarly different.

I can get that... but yes, completion percentage has skyrocketed...
There is a weird mathematical relationship between league completion percentage and league interception percentage that has held up throughout since 1933. If you take the end of the season passing stats for the league for each season (NFL, AFL or AAFC), and graph Y=C+2.3*I, where C is the league completion percentage and I is the league interception percentage for any given season, Y always stays in a range between .6 and .7, and has only been outside that range three times. In 85 percent of all seasons, C has remained between .63 and .68. As completion percentage increases by 2.3 percentage points, interception percentage has to decrease by one percentage point in order to keep it steady. I know this sounds strange, but if you check this out you will find this to be true.

Re: Richard Sherman

Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2018 7:44 pm
by rhickok1109
Rupert Patrick wrote: There is a weird mathematical relationship between league completion percentage and league interception percentage that has held up throughout since 1933. If you take the end of the season passing stats for the league for each season (NFL, AFL or AAFC), and graph Y=C+2.3*I, where C is the league completion percentage and I is the league interception percentage for any given season, Y always stays in a range between .6 and .7, and has only been outside that range three times. In 85 percent of all seasons, C has remained between .63 and .68. As completion percentage increases by 2.3 percentage points, interception percentage has to decrease by one percentage point in order to keep it steady. I know this sounds strange, but if you check this out you will find this to be true.
Wow, that's really amazing!

Re: Richard Sherman

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 11:31 am
by sluggermatt15
Sherman's had a great career. But IMO to be a lock to be elected into the HoF, he'll need a few more stellar seasons, which he is very capable of. Looking at the stats above, I think he's just about there. I would vote for Sherman.