2011 NY Giants discussion
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2025 4:44 pm
I'm sure-enough that everyone here can agree that this is the weakest SB-winner of all-time.
But a Title is a Title is a Title. After playing just enough, in the end, to get in the playoffs by winning that weak division, they go 4-0 in the post-season when it matters the absolute most against teams with a combined 51-13 record for all-the-marbles! 13-7 end-of-day, actually. Considering that Atlanta was a 'bleh' playoff team with the G-men actually at home for that one, and the Packers & Pats quite one-dimensional, that NFCCG-win at San Fran has to be their most impressive of the lot! Such a strong, balanced Forty Niners squad in Jim Harbaugh's first year with them, just as much a "should of" won the SB team as the following year ('11 vs '12 Forty Niners a good idea for a thread)!
Other than all just mentioned (again, a Title is a Title), is there anything else good or complimentary to say about this SB champ? Any regular-season style-points to give?
But a Title is a Title is a Title. After playing just enough, in the end, to get in the playoffs by winning that weak division, they go 4-0 in the post-season when it matters the absolute most against teams with a combined 51-13 record for all-the-marbles! 13-7 end-of-day, actually. Considering that Atlanta was a 'bleh' playoff team with the G-men actually at home for that one, and the Packers & Pats quite one-dimensional, that NFCCG-win at San Fran has to be their most impressive of the lot! Such a strong, balanced Forty Niners squad in Jim Harbaugh's first year with them, just as much a "should of" won the SB team as the following year ('11 vs '12 Forty Niners a good idea for a thread)!
Other than all just mentioned (again, a Title is a Title), is there anything else good or complimentary to say about this SB champ? Any regular-season style-points to give?