1970 AFC, how is it viewed in hindsight?
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2024 2:45 am
The AFL's Super Bowl wins in 1968 and 1969 have cemented the idea over time that the AFL had achieved parity with the NFL by the time the merger took place in 1970.
However, the records of the AFC teams in 1970 weren't good against NFC and former NFL teams in the AFC.
The old line AFL teams went 9-21-1 against the NFC teams.
The original NFL teams that joined the AFC were 18-10-1 against AFL teams with only the rebuilding Steelers having a losing record at 4-5 against AFL teams. So all told? NFL teams from 1969 were 39-19-2 against AFL teams from 1969.
The difference in the standings is striking. In the NFC, only the Eagles and Saints failed to win six games. Only five AFC teams achieved winning records with one of those being the Colts.
It's clear that the best AFL teams could beat the best NFL teams, that is not in dispute as it was proven on the field.
How are the AFC struggles in the first couple years of the merger (it gradually got better as the common draft took hold) properly viewed historically? It seems to me that the "parity" is a bit overstated. The AFL teams undeniably struggled once merged.
However, the records of the AFC teams in 1970 weren't good against NFC and former NFL teams in the AFC.
The old line AFL teams went 9-21-1 against the NFC teams.
The original NFL teams that joined the AFC were 18-10-1 against AFL teams with only the rebuilding Steelers having a losing record at 4-5 against AFL teams. So all told? NFL teams from 1969 were 39-19-2 against AFL teams from 1969.
The difference in the standings is striking. In the NFC, only the Eagles and Saints failed to win six games. Only five AFC teams achieved winning records with one of those being the Colts.
It's clear that the best AFL teams could beat the best NFL teams, that is not in dispute as it was proven on the field.
How are the AFC struggles in the first couple years of the merger (it gradually got better as the common draft took hold) properly viewed historically? It seems to me that the "parity" is a bit overstated. The AFL teams undeniably struggled once merged.