Page 1 of 3

Is the following record unbreakable?

Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2024 12:48 pm
by SeahawkFever
Took a look through pro football reference and noted the teams whose defenses forced the most punts in each season.

The team that appears to have forced the most punts is the 1984 Raiders who forced 117 punts; an average of 7.31 per game.

The 84 Raiders defense that forced these punts had three players with double digit sacks in Bill Pickell, Howie Long, and Rod Martin, and had three pro bowlers in their secondary in Vann McElroy, Lester Hayes and Mike Haynes; with Long, Martin and Haynes also being first team all pro.

Either way, 117 punts forced in a season; is that an unbreakable record?

Re: Is the following record unbreakable?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2024 6:47 am
by JuggernautJ
One of my favorite season previews is Dell's Illustrated Digest of Pro Football for 1972 (after the 1971 season) which has an article in it titled "They'll NEVER Beat (Jim) Brown's Records."
We've all seen how well that prediction holds up...

So, who knows what will happen in the future...
Perhaps 50 years from now when the pendulum has swung back to the defenses and there are 64 teams playing 24 game schedules on a 200 yard field such a record might be broken.
But I think it is highly unlikely in today's game. There are just too many advantages for the offenses.

Just out of curiosity, what was the next highest total for punts in a season?
And/or average punts per game.
Was there anyone close to the '84 Raiders?

Re: Is the following record unbreakable?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2024 5:06 pm
by SeahawkFever
JuggernautJ wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2024 6:47 am One of my favorite season previews is Dell's Illustrated Digest of Pro Football for 1972 (after the 1971 season) which has an article in it titled "They'll NEVER Beat (Jim) Brown's Records."
We've all seen how well that prediction holds up...

So, who knows what will happen in the future...
Perhaps 50 years from now when the pendulum has swung back to the defenses and there are 64 teams playing 24 game schedules on a 200 yard field such a record might be broken.
But I think it is highly unlikely in today's game. There are just too many advantages for the offenses.

Just out of curiosity, what was the next highest total for punts in a season?
And/or average punts per game.
Was there anyone close to the '84 Raiders?
I don’t know if this is the next highest total, but last season the Browns forced 112 punts; albeit in 17 games.

Nobody else in the last decade and a half has gotten 110 I believe.

Re: Is the following record unbreakable?

Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2024 7:31 pm
by Bob Gill
The Sports Encyclopedia: Pro Football, using numbers compiled from play-by-play accounts of each game in the Green Bay Press-Gazette, shows that the Packers' opponents punted 153 times in 1929, 129 in 1931, and 167 in 1932. And they never played more than 14 games in any of those seasons. Take that, Raiders!

Re: Is the following record unbreakable?

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 2:15 am
by SeahawkFever
Bob Gill wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2024 7:31 pm The Sports Encyclopedia: Pro Football, using numbers compiled from play-by-play accounts of each game in the Green Bay Press-Gazette, shows that the Packers' opponents punted 153 times in 1929, 129 in 1931, and 167 in 1932. And they never played more than 14 games in any of those seasons. Take that, Raiders!
Very true. Congrats to those 32 Packers then on overseeing 167 opposing punts then; 50 more than the 84 Raiders.

However on this site I have been told that punts in the first 25-30 years of the league’s history were done with a different strategy than more recent generations.

Re: Is the following record unbreakable?

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 7:20 am
by Bob Gill
SeahawkFever wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 2:15 am Very true. Congrats to those 32 Packers then on overseeing 167 opposing punts then; 50 more than the 84 Raiders.

However on this site I have been told that punts in the first 25-30 years of the league’s history were done with a different strategy than more recent generations.
Also true. For example, in 1932 the Packers, a team that went 10-3-1, punted 166 times themselves, just one less than their opponents. I think it's safe to say that wouldn't happen today.

Re: Is the following record unbreakable?

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 8:46 am
by ChrisBabcock
Verne Llewellen (possibly) punted 136 times himself in 1928.

https://www.jt-sw.com/football/pro/stat ... al/1928-gb

Re: Is the following record unbreakable?

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 2:32 pm
by SeahawkFever
Bob Gill wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 7:20 am
SeahawkFever wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 2:15 am Very true. Congrats to those 32 Packers then on overseeing 167 opposing punts then; 50 more than the 84 Raiders.

However on this site I have been told that punts in the first 25-30 years of the league’s history were done with a different strategy than more recent generations.
Also true. For example, in 1932 the Packers, a team that went 10-3-1, punted 166 times themselves, just one less than their opponents. I think it's safe to say that wouldn't happen today.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t punting in the 1930’s used very differently than it is now?

Re: Is the following record unbreakable?

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 2:45 pm
by Bob Gill
SeahawkFever wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 2:32 pm Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t punting in the 1930’s used very differently than it is now?
Oh, yeah. It was often used as an offensive weapon, because in those days field position could be more important than possession of the ball. The football itself was bigger and harder to handle, so fumbles were more common, and passes were intercepted two or three or five times more frequently than they are today. The rules were much tougher on the offensive team, too, so if you had the ball on your own 30 you didn't have a great chance of moving all the way down the field for a touchdown.

But if you punted and the other team took over on its own 30, you might recover a fumble or intercept a pass and find yourself only one or two first downs away from the end zone. That's why teams often punted on first or second down when they got the ball relatively deep in their own territory. Even the good teams did that at times, and the bad teams did it a lot, especially when they were facing the toughest opponents.

Re: Is the following record unbreakable?

Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2024 3:46 pm
by SeahawkFever
Bob Gill wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 2:45 pm
SeahawkFever wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 2:32 pm Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t punting in the 1930’s used very differently than it is now?
Oh, yeah. It was often used as an offensive weapon, because in those days field position could be more important than possession of the ball. The football itself was bigger and harder to handle, so fumbles were more common, and passes were intercepted two or three or five times more frequently than they are today. The rules were much tougher on the offensive team, too, so if you had the ball on your own 30 you didn't have a great chance of moving all the way down the field for a touchdown.

But if you punted and the other team took over on its own 30, you might recover a fumble or intercept a pass and find yourself only one or two first downs away from the end zone. That's why teams often punted on first or second down when they got the ball relatively deep in their own territory. Even the good teams did that at times, and the bad teams did it a lot, especially when they were facing the toughest opponents.
Is it known roughly when teams began punting for purposes like what we are used to seeing in more recent decades?