'34 Lions...WOW!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2021 11:29 pm
Learn something new every day...
In the very season of the quite infamous 'Sneakers Game', I had NO IDEA that the Lions (in their very first year of no longer being the Portsmouth Spartans) not only started 10-0 alongside their division rival, Bears, but that they were UN-SCORED UPON in each of their FIRST SEVEN GAMES!! Quite 1920 Pros-esque, if I do say so myself!
Not only were both Detroit & Chicago on a collision-course to meet in a 'Battle-of-Unbeatens' in Week #12 - just like NYG/SF would be 57 years later, only this one would actually take place on Thanksgiving - but both were to then meet a second time not just the very next game, but a mere three days later on the following Sunday for the season finale (yes, three games in seven days for each; sign of the times)! And almost like 57 years later, a 'Battle-of-Unbeatens it wouldn't be. Oh, da Bears did their part in making it 11-0! But Green Bay spoiled things at Detroit, pitching a 3-0 shutout - exactly as Lions did to them almost two months earlier. Though each contest would be close, Bears would then win their two vs Detroit thus winning the Western at 13-0.
Damn, if Lions could have just averted that Packer-upset, Turkey Day could have been 'Game 1' of a best-of-three!
As for that Mammoth 7-0 (118-0) start (a pair of 40-burgers making it a 215-27 total after the three other wins), a Colossal defense-effort first-and-foremost; credit where credit is due. But though the now decade-and-a-half-old league came a long way (now having entered into the 'championship game' era), still enough archaic leftoverture from its very beginnings still ever-present-enough to help make a phenomenon still possible. Lions & Bears themselves were the only double-digit winners with the G-men being the next up at 8-5, then Green Bay at 7-6, and then the rest being bad teams - not to mention brand-spanking-new 'Pirates' and...the Reds/Gunners!! All NFL teams "from now on" all playing an equal amount of games was still two years away.
The following year, the Lions do win their first title. But no double-digit wins yet alone another 10-0 start! A quite un-sexy 'bleh' 7-3-2 mark instead. And with Green Bay not only winning more games than they at 8-4-0, but sweeping the Lions along with also beating the G-men who'd win the Eastern yet again and with a better record to boot at 9-3! But the Eastern would once again be a bad division whereas both Chicago teams tied for 'last place' in the Western at...6-4-2! The only winner G-men beat were the Bears, 3-0; but not before losing to them the previous game, 20-3. And it showed in the League Championship Game as the Lions hammered them!
EDIT - Packers, in '35, didn't sweep the Lions. They played each other three times with the Pack winning two, but Lions winning one.
In the very season of the quite infamous 'Sneakers Game', I had NO IDEA that the Lions (in their very first year of no longer being the Portsmouth Spartans) not only started 10-0 alongside their division rival, Bears, but that they were UN-SCORED UPON in each of their FIRST SEVEN GAMES!! Quite 1920 Pros-esque, if I do say so myself!
Not only were both Detroit & Chicago on a collision-course to meet in a 'Battle-of-Unbeatens' in Week #12 - just like NYG/SF would be 57 years later, only this one would actually take place on Thanksgiving - but both were to then meet a second time not just the very next game, but a mere three days later on the following Sunday for the season finale (yes, three games in seven days for each; sign of the times)! And almost like 57 years later, a 'Battle-of-Unbeatens it wouldn't be. Oh, da Bears did their part in making it 11-0! But Green Bay spoiled things at Detroit, pitching a 3-0 shutout - exactly as Lions did to them almost two months earlier. Though each contest would be close, Bears would then win their two vs Detroit thus winning the Western at 13-0.
Damn, if Lions could have just averted that Packer-upset, Turkey Day could have been 'Game 1' of a best-of-three!
As for that Mammoth 7-0 (118-0) start (a pair of 40-burgers making it a 215-27 total after the three other wins), a Colossal defense-effort first-and-foremost; credit where credit is due. But though the now decade-and-a-half-old league came a long way (now having entered into the 'championship game' era), still enough archaic leftoverture from its very beginnings still ever-present-enough to help make a phenomenon still possible. Lions & Bears themselves were the only double-digit winners with the G-men being the next up at 8-5, then Green Bay at 7-6, and then the rest being bad teams - not to mention brand-spanking-new 'Pirates' and...the Reds/Gunners!! All NFL teams "from now on" all playing an equal amount of games was still two years away.
The following year, the Lions do win their first title. But no double-digit wins yet alone another 10-0 start! A quite un-sexy 'bleh' 7-3-2 mark instead. And with Green Bay not only winning more games than they at 8-4-0, but sweeping the Lions along with also beating the G-men who'd win the Eastern yet again and with a better record to boot at 9-3! But the Eastern would once again be a bad division whereas both Chicago teams tied for 'last place' in the Western at...6-4-2! The only winner G-men beat were the Bears, 3-0; but not before losing to them the previous game, 20-3. And it showed in the League Championship Game as the Lions hammered them!
EDIT - Packers, in '35, didn't sweep the Lions. They played each other three times with the Pack winning two, but Lions winning one.