By the skin of their teeth?
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:32 am
There's an old idiom, "by the skin of (one's) teeth," that is used to say that someone just barely succeeded in something. I've been noticing how many franchises failed in the early decades of the APFA/NFL, and it makes me wonder, were most owners operating by the skin of their teeth? I'm also curious to know the common financial practices in those early days. I have questions, such as...
Did home teams provide guarantees to visiting teams, like they do even today at the college level?
Did those guarantees cover travel expenses?
Did they share gate receipts, or did the home team get to keep those receipts?
What percentage of a team's expenses was devoted to payroll?
Were star players paid significantly more?
Which teams had owners with deep pockets who operated at a loss? (Or did all successful owners have deep pockets?)
I've seen speculative answers to some of these questions in my reading over the years, but I don't recall anything definitive. What answers to these types of questions have you run across?
Did home teams provide guarantees to visiting teams, like they do even today at the college level?
Did those guarantees cover travel expenses?
Did they share gate receipts, or did the home team get to keep those receipts?
What percentage of a team's expenses was devoted to payroll?
Were star players paid significantly more?
Which teams had owners with deep pockets who operated at a loss? (Or did all successful owners have deep pockets?)
I've seen speculative answers to some of these questions in my reading over the years, but I don't recall anything definitive. What answers to these types of questions have you run across?