original Super Bowl homefield discussion
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2020 10:36 am
What was the discussion back in 1966 about having the Super Bowl played at a neutral site? Was that a Rozelle idea? Did any faction prefer the current format of having the title game at one of the participating teams' home stadium?
I think an unintentional (intentional?) byproduct of the neutral site format is that the game itself is played in a sterile, controlled environment for the most part. We don't see title games like the 1965 Packers-Browns anymore. Every Super Bowl is a carbon copy of the previous one in terms of aesthetics...night game, perhaps in a dome, national anthem, excessive fireworks leading to smoke, overwrought halftime show, confetti. Rinse, repeat.
Bonus Super Bowl trivia: what two brothers 'unofficially' fumbled on the same Super Bowl play?
I think an unintentional (intentional?) byproduct of the neutral site format is that the game itself is played in a sterile, controlled environment for the most part. We don't see title games like the 1965 Packers-Browns anymore. Every Super Bowl is a carbon copy of the previous one in terms of aesthetics...night game, perhaps in a dome, national anthem, excessive fireworks leading to smoke, overwrought halftime show, confetti. Rinse, repeat.
Bonus Super Bowl trivia: what two brothers 'unofficially' fumbled on the same Super Bowl play?