A forgotten rivalry, of sorts. Not so sure how much it was seen as one even during this decade; perhaps some of you who remember can chime in. When you tally things up, Cleveland still had the noticeable decade advantage at 11-6-3. However, it’s the ’64 campaign, Cards going 1-0-1 vs them only to finish half a game behind, that may lead one into thinking that the decade series would have been closer. Also, there’s the Cardinal (2-0) sweep over them in ’68 (also ending a half game out), but of course that second win was the finale, Browns having already clinched the ‘Century’ (remember, no wild cards; just division-winners). Thoughts?
PS - I like that old logo with the giant Cardinal carrying a football beneath the Arch!
’60s Browns-vs-Cardinals discussion
Re: ’60s Browns-vs-Cardinals discussion
Throwing you a bone here. The Browns were clearly the more talented team throughout the decade, not to say the Cards may not have had some underrated talent - and we all know about Wilson. But interestingly, the Cards were - for that era - one of the more experimental teams, Safety Blitz, Zone Blitz - no Bill Arnsbarger did not "invent" it - they really made well of their talent, the Offensive talent and the O Line stunk for the early 60's.
- RyanChristiansen
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:51 pm
- Location: Fargo, ND
Re: ’60s Browns-vs-Cardinals discussion
In the attached article, perhaps a little sarcasm in the quotes from Blanton Collier and Charley Johnson.
- Attachments
-
- Spartanburg Herald, December 8, 1964
- FE01FF73-624D-4B7C-8810-3C9D33AEC75D.jpeg (240.32 KiB) Viewed 14101 times
"Five seconds to go... A field goal could win it. Up in the air! Going deep! Tipped! Caught! Touchdown! The Vikings! They win it! Time has run out!" - Vikings 28, Browns 23, December 14, 1980, Metropolitan Stadium
- 74_75_78_79_
- Posts: 2632
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:25 pm
Re: ’60s Browns-vs-Cardinals discussion
Good responses! Didn’t know the ’60s Cards were experimental. Nice little article; Browns tying the final week would have made for a nice tie-breaker game. I can only imagine it would have (fairly, due to 1-0-1 H2H record) been held in StL.
1964 and 1970 would have to be the two most disappointing seasons for Cardinal-fans beneath the Arch. Very close they were to hosting a Colts team who did underachieve, 0-27, at Cleveland in the NFLCG. Do Colts underachieve vs Cards as well in such an event? And then six years later, en route to that 8-2-1 start, winning three in a row (Wks 7-thru-9) by a combined 113-0, third game 38-0 at Dallas on MNF (looking like a Super Bowl team), only to then...
1964 and 1970 would have to be the two most disappointing seasons for Cardinal-fans beneath the Arch. Very close they were to hosting a Colts team who did underachieve, 0-27, at Cleveland in the NFLCG. Do Colts underachieve vs Cards as well in such an event? And then six years later, en route to that 8-2-1 start, winning three in a row (Wks 7-thru-9) by a combined 113-0, third game 38-0 at Dallas on MNF (looking like a Super Bowl team), only to then...
Re: ’60s Browns-vs-Cardinals discussion
From 1963 through 1969, the Cards always got up for the Browns. They would often beat the Browns in Cleveland early in the season, then lose or tie a mediocre (or bad) team, like the Giants or Pittsburgh. A loss and tie to the Giants cost the Cards the title in the Eastern Conference in 1964, and a tie with Pittsburgh did them in in 1968.
In 1970, it looked like the Cards had their division just about wrapped up, but lost their last 3 to allow the Cowboys to back into winning the Eastern Division that year. Dallas ended up going to the Super Bowl that year.
In 1970, it looked like the Cards had their division just about wrapped up, but lost their last 3 to allow the Cowboys to back into winning the Eastern Division that year. Dallas ended up going to the Super Bowl that year.
-
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 1:30 pm
Re: ’60s Browns-vs-Cardinals discussion
That '64 tie came in Week 2, with the Cardinals leading 30-26 and the Browns facing 4th-and-19 at the St. Louis 45 with less than 90 seconds left. Frank Ryan connected with Gary Collins at the 2, with Jim Brown then scoring with 1:07 left. Charley Johnson then managed to drive the Cardinals yards in roughly a minute, with Jim Bakken getting the tie with five seconds left.
The start of the game had Frank Ryan getting picked off by Larry Stallings (thanks to a Joe Robb deflection) on the first play. On their first play, Johnson hit John David Crow for a 22-yard touchdown pass 50 seconds into the game.
The start of the game had Frank Ryan getting picked off by Larry Stallings (thanks to a Joe Robb deflection) on the first play. On their first play, Johnson hit John David Crow for a 22-yard touchdown pass 50 seconds into the game.
Re: ’60s Browns-vs-Cardinals discussion
BD Sullivan wrote:That '64 tie came in Week 2, with the Cardinals leading 30-26 and the Browns facing 4th-and-19 at the St. Louis 45 with less than 90 seconds left. Frank Ryan connected with Gary Collins at the 2, with Jim Brown then scoring with 1:07 left. Charley Johnson then managed to drive the Cardinals yards in roughly a minute, with Jim Bakken getting the tie with five seconds left.
The start of the game had Frank Ryan getting picked off by Larry Stallings (thanks to a Joe Robb deflection) on the first play. On their first play, Johnson hit John David Crow for a 22-yard touchdown pass 50 seconds into the game.
The Cards had two ties in 1964, one to Cleveland and one to the Giants, who had a record of 2 wins, 10 losses, and 2 ties in 1964 to finish in last place. Their final regular season records in 1964 were 10-3-1 for Cleveland and 9-3-2 for the Cards.