Top 10 NFL regular season Power Rankings, 1978
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:33 am
Couldn't avoid this season, could we? The first ever 16-game season; first with 10 playoff teams. Fourteen teams total finished with a winning record. Three finished 8-8 starting with Washington who, of course, notoriously started 6-0. But the other two also started well - the Browns at 3-0/4-2, and the Jets who were only ever below-500 after a Week #5 loss to Steelers; enjoyed a 2-0, 5-3, 6-4 and then a 8-6 start before dropping their final two (the first of those two an OT-loss on the road to...the Browns). Do 8-7-1 division-winner Vikes, 9-7 Falcons & 9-7 Eagles ALL risk getting boxed-out by that trio of 9-7 non-playoff-participants from the super-strong AFC West?
Considering this is judging by regular-season's end not knowing what would happen in the playoffs, the Pats may suffer very-high positioning not just from the Fairbanks situation, but losing at home to Houston (yes, in regular season as well) and at Dallas down the stretch (no, can't count MNF finale at Miami; East was already clinched).
As for cream of the crop in these rankings...yes, Steelers & Dallas first two to come to mind but the RAMS got quite an argument! PRs-wise, at least! They finished 12-4 as opposed to Steelers' 14-2, and Dallas (the other 12-4) are defending-Champs, but Malavasi's bunch did beat 'em BOTH (and neither one in the finale as Rams did vs the 'Burgh three years prior)! And not only did they win at Houston as well, but how about going...7-1 vs the EIGHT total above-500 teams they played?? Dallas was 4-3 vs the seven winners they played against, and the Steelers...they only played against five winners in '78 going 3-2 against them; or shouldn't their finale victory vs Denver be counted? Steelers playoff-position obviously already set but didn't the same go for Denver? Did Pats already clinch 2nd-seed? In either event, this doesn't make LA an automatic shoe-in for #1; but at least something to strongly consider before giving Pitt/Dal the top-2. Yes, 6-combined-SB-berths so far in the decade between the two; and Rams did finish 5-4 after that 7-0 start. Just the same, it's hard to fathom the (2nd-half) egg that was laid at the Colseum, NFCC.
Considering this is judging by regular-season's end not knowing what would happen in the playoffs, the Pats may suffer very-high positioning not just from the Fairbanks situation, but losing at home to Houston (yes, in regular season as well) and at Dallas down the stretch (no, can't count MNF finale at Miami; East was already clinched).
As for cream of the crop in these rankings...yes, Steelers & Dallas first two to come to mind but the RAMS got quite an argument! PRs-wise, at least! They finished 12-4 as opposed to Steelers' 14-2, and Dallas (the other 12-4) are defending-Champs, but Malavasi's bunch did beat 'em BOTH (and neither one in the finale as Rams did vs the 'Burgh three years prior)! And not only did they win at Houston as well, but how about going...7-1 vs the EIGHT total above-500 teams they played?? Dallas was 4-3 vs the seven winners they played against, and the Steelers...they only played against five winners in '78 going 3-2 against them; or shouldn't their finale victory vs Denver be counted? Steelers playoff-position obviously already set but didn't the same go for Denver? Did Pats already clinch 2nd-seed? In either event, this doesn't make LA an automatic shoe-in for #1; but at least something to strongly consider before giving Pitt/Dal the top-2. Yes, 6-combined-SB-berths so far in the decade between the two; and Rams did finish 5-4 after that 7-0 start. Just the same, it's hard to fathom the (2nd-half) egg that was laid at the Colseum, NFCC.