Motley and Jagade
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:46 pm
I think that Marion Motley is one of the greatest football players of all time. He could do it all. His 5.7 rushing yards per attempt is the best in history and he blocked like a demon. As a fullback, he should be ranked at or near the very top when you consider both his running and blocking.
He was also a great linebacker. His coach, Paul Brown, said that Motley could have made the Hall of Fame just as a linebacker if he did not play fullback. I guess that should qualify him as one of the greatest players ever.
For 5 years (1946-50), Marion Motley was the best fullback in football. In 1951, disaster happened. His knee was badly injured in training camp. After leading the NFL in rushing in 1950 with an average rush of 5.8 yards and a total of 810 yards (in a 12 game season), Motley was not even Cleveland's second leading rusher in 1951 (Dub Jones and Ken Carpenter were the Browns leading rushers that year). Because of his knee injuries, Marion was no longer in his prime. He was also on the wrong side of 30. He only gained 273 yards on 61 carries in 1951.
Motley came back a little in 1952, gaining 444 yards on 104 carries. This was 6th best in the league (5th best if the championship game is counted in. Bob "Hunchy" Hoernschemeyer, who was 5th in the league in rushing, also played in the championship for Detroit) 6th best is pretty good when you consider that Motley lost his starting fullback job after 9 games.
Reminds me of something that was said about the boxer Roberto Duran. He was the best in his prime and the best over the hill boxer. In 1952, the past his best Motley was still pretty good. Ironically, after 9 games that year, he was replaced as the starting fullback by Chick Jagade.
I am not about to compare a prime Jagade with a prime Motley, but in 1952, coach Brown apparently felt that Jagade was, at that time, the more effective fullback. Harry "Chick" Jagade was a big, strong player who ran hard and sometimes would knock would be tacklers over (hence the nickname "Jarrin Chick"). He was also a very good blocker, probably the equal of Marion Motley in 1952, if not before.
In the 10th game of 1952, Jarrin Chick got the starting assignment at fullback for the Cleveland Browns. He was kind of sensational gaining 147 yards on 16 carries. Jagade kept up his good work right through the championship game with Detroit when he rushed for 104 yards on 15 carries and scored Cleveland's only touchdown.
I read somewhere that some implied coach Brown did not treat Motley well by replacing him with Jagade. I have to disagree. Yes, Motley was still one of the better fullbacks around the league, even though he was past his prime at 32 with bad knees. Jagade was in his prime at 26, and was very good. If Chick could do a better job than Motley at that point, and Brown must have thought so, then would it have been fair to Jagade and to the team itself to keep playing Marion Motley at fullback out of sentiment and because of what Motley had done for the team in the past?
Motley still got some playing time at fullback and on the goal line defense after losing his starting fullback job to Jagade. In the 1952 title game, Marion broke away for a 41 yard gain late in the game. Unfortunately, Cleveland did not take advantage of this and lost to Detroit that day, 17 to 7. Like I said, despite being past his best with bad knees, Marion Motley was still one of the better fullbacks around the NFL in 1952.
He was also a great linebacker. His coach, Paul Brown, said that Motley could have made the Hall of Fame just as a linebacker if he did not play fullback. I guess that should qualify him as one of the greatest players ever.
For 5 years (1946-50), Marion Motley was the best fullback in football. In 1951, disaster happened. His knee was badly injured in training camp. After leading the NFL in rushing in 1950 with an average rush of 5.8 yards and a total of 810 yards (in a 12 game season), Motley was not even Cleveland's second leading rusher in 1951 (Dub Jones and Ken Carpenter were the Browns leading rushers that year). Because of his knee injuries, Marion was no longer in his prime. He was also on the wrong side of 30. He only gained 273 yards on 61 carries in 1951.
Motley came back a little in 1952, gaining 444 yards on 104 carries. This was 6th best in the league (5th best if the championship game is counted in. Bob "Hunchy" Hoernschemeyer, who was 5th in the league in rushing, also played in the championship for Detroit) 6th best is pretty good when you consider that Motley lost his starting fullback job after 9 games.
Reminds me of something that was said about the boxer Roberto Duran. He was the best in his prime and the best over the hill boxer. In 1952, the past his best Motley was still pretty good. Ironically, after 9 games that year, he was replaced as the starting fullback by Chick Jagade.
I am not about to compare a prime Jagade with a prime Motley, but in 1952, coach Brown apparently felt that Jagade was, at that time, the more effective fullback. Harry "Chick" Jagade was a big, strong player who ran hard and sometimes would knock would be tacklers over (hence the nickname "Jarrin Chick"). He was also a very good blocker, probably the equal of Marion Motley in 1952, if not before.
In the 10th game of 1952, Jarrin Chick got the starting assignment at fullback for the Cleveland Browns. He was kind of sensational gaining 147 yards on 16 carries. Jagade kept up his good work right through the championship game with Detroit when he rushed for 104 yards on 15 carries and scored Cleveland's only touchdown.
I read somewhere that some implied coach Brown did not treat Motley well by replacing him with Jagade. I have to disagree. Yes, Motley was still one of the better fullbacks around the league, even though he was past his prime at 32 with bad knees. Jagade was in his prime at 26, and was very good. If Chick could do a better job than Motley at that point, and Brown must have thought so, then would it have been fair to Jagade and to the team itself to keep playing Marion Motley at fullback out of sentiment and because of what Motley had done for the team in the past?
Motley still got some playing time at fullback and on the goal line defense after losing his starting fullback job to Jagade. In the 1952 title game, Marion broke away for a 41 yard gain late in the game. Unfortunately, Cleveland did not take advantage of this and lost to Detroit that day, 17 to 7. Like I said, despite being past his best with bad knees, Marion Motley was still one of the better fullbacks around the NFL in 1952.