Worst WR corps to play in SB?
-
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 1:28 pm
Worst WR corps to play in SB?
Where will Panthers wide-outs rank?
Re: Worst WR corps to play in SB?
The 1986 Giants might be the answer.
-
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 1:28 pm
Re: Worst WR corps to play in SB?
there are actually lots of good choices... 1979 Rams, for exampleJWL wrote:The 1986 Giants might be the answer.
- 74_75_78_79_
- Posts: 2526
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:25 pm
Re: Worst WR corps to play in SB?
Yes...LOTS of choices! Many if you're talking strictly SB-winners, but we're talking PARTICIPANTS so the list can be endless! It seems, historically, that most champions or those who play for the title don't need a 'premiere' WR corps.JohnTurney wrote:there are actually lots of good choices... 1979 Rams, for exampleJWL wrote:The 1986 Giants might be the answer.
-
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 1:28 pm
Re: Worst WR corps to play in SB?
going by participants since we don't know if Panthers will win or not74_75_78_79_ wrote:Yes...LOTS of choices! Many if you're talking strictly SB-winners, but we're talking PARTICIPANTS so the list can be endless! It seems, historically, that most champions or those who play for the title don't need a 'premiere' WR corps.JohnTurney wrote:there are actually lots of good choices... 1979 Rams, for exampleJWL wrote:The 1986 Giants might be the answer.
-
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: Worst WR corps to play in SB?
The San Diego based writer Jerry Magee loved to ridicule the Los Angeles Rams in his Pro Football Weekly column. I recall in 1979 Magee wrote of the Rams: "They have no wide receivers." The only part of the Rams Magee admired was the defensive line. He also observed that the 1978-79 Rams often failed to cover the spread even when they won.JohnTurney wrote:there are actually lots of good choices... 1979 Rams, for exampleJWL wrote:The 1986 Giants might be the answer.
- 74_75_78_79_
- Posts: 2526
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:25 pm
Re: Worst WR corps to play in SB?
This seems like a thread worth reviving!
-
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:18 am
Re: Worst WR corps to play in SB?
After looking at the responses, one question I have is are we counting the tight ends as part of the group? Some teams have used their tight ends as targets; especially more recently. The 1986 Giants would have had Mark Bavaro.
If we are going a round lower, then the 2002 Eagles made the NFC Championship Game and their best target was Chad Lewis. I've heard the players listed at wide receiver for that team weren't anything of note.
If we are going a round lower, then the 2002 Eagles made the NFC Championship Game and their best target was Chad Lewis. I've heard the players listed at wide receiver for that team weren't anything of note.
- 74_75_78_79_
- Posts: 2526
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:25 pm
Re: Worst WR corps to play in SB?
I can't see why a TE can't be included. But if a passing-attack is essentially just the TE and nothing else, then not a good receiving corps if you ask me. Those '86 and '90 Giants are solid candidates in this. And what about the '00 Giants? And their SB opponents that year - they "just" having a TE in Shannon Sharpe!SeahawkFever wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2024 8:44 pm After looking at the responses, one question I have is are we counting the tight ends as part of the group? Some teams have used their tight ends as targets; especially more recently. The 1986 Giants would have had Mark Bavaro.
If we are going a round lower, then the 2002 Eagles made the NFC Championship Game and their best target was Chad Lewis. I've heard the players listed at wide receiver for that team weren't anything of note.
Not having any real WR-power may explain some of McNabb not being an even better QB as well as Reid's Eagles coming up short in those conference championship games other than when TO hopped on and they made the Super Bowl.
But then look at the early-'00s Patriots? Another solid candidate in this. Without quickly looking it up, I can't name any of their WRs. Of course I'll then say, "oh yeah, that's right" to a couple of names I'd see but no real significant ones which is a testament to Brady's All-Time greatness. He gets to have Moss & Welker but wins no Rings again until 2016 when both are already gone - go figure. Edelman a true warrior/gamer and that Classic catch against Atlanta in that comeback, but not at all on their level.
For Moss to be a part of two separate teams that went a combined 34-3 yet no Ring? Perhaps its a testimony that too much WR-power on a team, though good enough to win you many games in the regular season and go deep enough in the playoffs, may make you come up just short. Look at the '84 Dolphins? '13 Broncos, etc? Yes, '94 Forty Niners, '99 Rams, '19 Chiefs, but not a whole lot of significant high-octane passing attacks that won-it-all.
Yes, Dwight Clark, but '81 & '84 pre-Rice Forty NIners worth a mention at least.
'98 Falcons?
'82 Dolphins?
- GameBeforeTheMoney
- Posts: 707
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2021 3:21 pm
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Re: Worst WR corps to play in SB?
Don't forget Freddie Soloman on the 49ers! 98 Falcons had two receivers over 1K yards.
I'd say SB 4 Minnesota. Gene Washington was just okay and he was #1. I have to say I don't remember that team, so there's a caveat to my answer. Anybody remember that team well? 79 Rams - that's of course a really good answer also. But I remember thinking Preston Dennard was pretty good.
I'd say SB 4 Minnesota. Gene Washington was just okay and he was #1. I have to say I don't remember that team, so there's a caveat to my answer. Anybody remember that team well? 79 Rams - that's of course a really good answer also. But I remember thinking Preston Dennard was pretty good.
Podcast: https://Podcast.TheGameBeforeTheMoney.com
Website/Blog: https://TheGameBeforeTheMoney.com
Author's Name: Jackson Michael
Website/Blog: https://TheGameBeforeTheMoney.com
Author's Name: Jackson Michael