Conspiracy theory? Not bloody likely ...
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 1:09 pm
OK, let me clarify about this scandal .....
On March 4, I posted on the forum that I could not access the forum from my home PC. On March 9, Oldcapecod sent an email to me asking if anyone had contacted me regarding this matter. I replied that no one had, thinking we were talking about the message I posted on March 4. The fact is that Chris and at least one other member had contacted my before my post of March 4. My March 4 post was made because the issue had still not been resolved since the first time I mentioned it, weeks before March 4. It wasn't meant to disparage anyone on the forum, or any officers of the PFRA. I was simply stating that I still could not get on the forum from my home PC.
As far as conspiracies are concerned ... Chris Willis is a good friend of mine. He has a full time job that occupies him well beyond the normal 40 hour, Mon-Fri work week. He doesn't have the time to rush to my aide--or anyone else's--at the drop of a hat. Furthermore, I may sound biased, but I haven't seen evidence of preferential treatment on this board or within the PFRA in general. From what I understand, the forum issues really have nothing to do with the officers or PFRA members at all. Remember that the officers are serving pro bono, and the responsibilities often grow to unforeseen proportions. The work that Ken C, Mark F, Chris W, Andy P, and all others have done in their roles is highly commendable.
To Oldcapecod ... thank you for your efforts in trying to get my issues resolved.
If my messages regarding access to the forum are the root of all of this ill feeling, then I hereby apologize, unequivocally and unreservedly. We're all here for the same reason.
On March 4, I posted on the forum that I could not access the forum from my home PC. On March 9, Oldcapecod sent an email to me asking if anyone had contacted me regarding this matter. I replied that no one had, thinking we were talking about the message I posted on March 4. The fact is that Chris and at least one other member had contacted my before my post of March 4. My March 4 post was made because the issue had still not been resolved since the first time I mentioned it, weeks before March 4. It wasn't meant to disparage anyone on the forum, or any officers of the PFRA. I was simply stating that I still could not get on the forum from my home PC.
As far as conspiracies are concerned ... Chris Willis is a good friend of mine. He has a full time job that occupies him well beyond the normal 40 hour, Mon-Fri work week. He doesn't have the time to rush to my aide--or anyone else's--at the drop of a hat. Furthermore, I may sound biased, but I haven't seen evidence of preferential treatment on this board or within the PFRA in general. From what I understand, the forum issues really have nothing to do with the officers or PFRA members at all. Remember that the officers are serving pro bono, and the responsibilities often grow to unforeseen proportions. The work that Ken C, Mark F, Chris W, Andy P, and all others have done in their roles is highly commendable.
To Oldcapecod ... thank you for your efforts in trying to get my issues resolved.
If my messages regarding access to the forum are the root of all of this ill feeling, then I hereby apologize, unequivocally and unreservedly. We're all here for the same reason.