Page 6 of 6
Re: Are the 1990 Giants underrated?
Posted: Sat May 23, 2026 7:31 am
by 7DnBrnc53
So what? they didn’t make it
Yeah, but from where the Packers used to be, that's pretty good. 1989 was their first non-strike winning season in eleven years, and their first ten-win season since 1972.
Re: Are the 1990 Giants underrated?
Posted: Sat May 23, 2026 8:36 pm
by Sonny9
CSKreager wrote: ↑Fri May 22, 2026 1:29 am
Was it?
Washington was an offensive line and not much else, the Eagles were frauds, the Giants had no passing game, the Cardinals were the Cardinals.
Dallas didn’t start winning until everybody else in the division aged in dog years.
Should we base it on perception while ignoring their records? Is that how it's done?
Washington was +800 in yards and +5 in turnovers while Philly had over a 1000 yard differential and +2 in turnovers. None of that matters because of what again?