Are the 1990 Giants underrated?

7DnBrnc53
Posts: 1715
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 7:57 pm

Re: Are the 1990 Giants underrated?

Post by 7DnBrnc53 »

So what? they didn’t make it
Yeah, but from where the Packers used to be, that's pretty good. 1989 was their first non-strike winning season in eleven years, and their first ten-win season since 1972.
Sonny9
Posts: 396
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:57 pm

Re: Are the 1990 Giants underrated?

Post by Sonny9 »

CSKreager wrote: Fri May 22, 2026 1:29 am Was it?

Washington was an offensive line and not much else, the Eagles were frauds, the Giants had no passing game, the Cardinals were the Cardinals.

Dallas didn’t start winning until everybody else in the division aged in dog years.
Should we base it on perception while ignoring their records? Is that how it's done?

Washington was +800 in yards and +5 in turnovers while Philly had over a 1000 yard differential and +2 in turnovers. None of that matters because of what again?
CSKreager
Posts: 1103
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 8:13 pm

Re: Are the 1990 Giants underrated?

Post by CSKreager »

Sonny9 wrote: Sat May 23, 2026 8:36 pm
CSKreager wrote: Fri May 22, 2026 1:29 am Was it?

Washington was an offensive line and not much else, the Eagles were frauds, the Giants had no passing game, the Cardinals were the Cardinals.

Dallas didn’t start winning until everybody else in the division aged in dog years.
Should we base it on perception while ignoring their records? Is that how it's done?

Washington was +800 in yards and +5 in turnovers while Philly had over a 1000 yard differential and +2 in turnovers. None of that matters because of what again?
Washington and Philly rang up a lot of those yards against bad teams outside of the wildly overrated NFCE
Sonny9
Posts: 396
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:57 pm

Re: Are the 1990 Giants underrated?

Post by Sonny9 »

CSKreager wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2026 8:59 pm
Sonny9 wrote: Sat May 23, 2026 8:36 pm
CSKreager wrote: Fri May 22, 2026 1:29 am Was it?

Washington was an offensive line and not much else, the Eagles were frauds, the Giants had no passing game, the Cardinals were the Cardinals.

Dallas didn’t start winning until everybody else in the division aged in dog years.
Should we base it on perception while ignoring their records? Is that how it's done?

Washington was +800 in yards and +5 in turnovers while Philly had over a 1000 yard differential and +2 in turnovers. None of that matters because of what again?
Washington and Philly rang up a lot of those yards against bad teams outside of the wildly overrated NFCE
The NFC East had the best record out of the 6 divisions. Teams rack up a lot of yardage against bad teams, because those teams are bad.
Post Reply