CSKreager wrote: ↑Sat Jul 04, 2026 12:47 pm
ShinobiMusashi wrote: ↑Sat Jul 04, 2026 10:01 am
The 1999 Jaguars schedule always stood out to me for how easy it was, for all the hype that team gets. They only played 1 good team all season, they played them 3 times, and lost all 3.
Tennessee didn’t exactly have a gauntlet schedule by comparison.
Heck I think they would have a better shot in SB XXXIV had they switched to Neil O’Donnell when they trailed 16-0
What everyone forgets about 1999, starting with myself (and caught myself doing it yet again just minutes ago), is that there were ONLY 11 teams of the 31 that finished the regular season with winning records. And three of those ten were 9-7 teams. This means just 8 teams with double-digit wins. And two of the playoffs teams - both of them in the NFC - finished 8-8. There were a grand total of NINE 8-8 teams! KC, in the AFC, was the only 9-7 team which didn't make the playoffs.
So just about everyone didn't have the toughest of schedules. The Titans played 4 winners in '99 going 3-1 against them - sweeping the Jags, beating the Rams, but losing at Miami which brought the Dolphins' record to 7-1 just before you-know-what. 3-1 vs winning teams whereas StL lost to the only winner they played (Tenn) and also lost to the 8-8 Lions making it 0-2 against playoff teams.
But both those losses could have easily gone the other way while, again, the Rams blew-out those bad teams the way a Champ ought to. In the playoffs, StL ultimately proved their true grit by opening up such a big lead vs Minny before taking their foot off the pedal and then beating two smash-mouth teams in a row for the Vince! Paper-tiger 'wimps' feeding off easy schedules don't do that kind of stuff once the playoffs start; they fold up after one punch to the gut and go one-and-out.
And the Jags, of course, didn't beat a winner at all (0-2 vs Tenn) until '62-7' in the divisional round. Not as good as StL but they still were a true champion-caliber team. Just that they weren't better than the Titans either; or, at the very least, Tenn had their #. Jags/Rams would have made for an exciting shoot-out of a Super Bowl but, to me, the Titans were the even better fit for 'The Greatest Show' to make SBXXXIV what it, indeed, was! The simple contrast-in-styles of it all as opposed to a track-meet, or a '77-like slug-out affair which would have been the case between TB & Tenn. Jags & Bucs would have offered up that contrast-in-styles as well, but just a tad lesser it would have been than what we actually got, I think.
O'Donnell coming in for McNair down 16-0?? Not easy at all to agree with that. McNair did bring them all the way back and were just...one-yard-shy. Any game Neil had previously was all but gone by then. The only post-Steeler notables I can come up with is his sick opener at Seattle in '97, and pulling one off on his former team (my Steelers) in '98. My bad if there are others I should remember. But I'm pretty sure that he doesn't engineer a grinding steamroller of a comeback against the Rams' D. It was both Eddie George AND McNair together wearing out that Ram-D, almost bringing it into OT. But like true Champs, they caught their breaths, and stopped 'em when it mattered most in the very bitter end!
One of the better Super Bowls ever! Not bad considering it was between a Rams team no longer in LA and a team no longer named 'the Houston Oilers'.
PS - both Rams' & Jags' divisions were matched against each other in '99. Yes, Rams finished in 5th the year before, but a new scheduling formula was now in-place due to the Browns re-entering, adding a
31st team to the league! And I thought all-along that it was then each team playing three, instead of four, teams from their matched division across-conference. But I see the Jags played all other four teams in the NFC West besides StL. I don't exactly know that '99-thru-'01 scheduling formula to a tee. I guess some of the non-5th-place teams from the year before played three teams from the other conference, and some played four.