Re: Safest Records
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 12:08 pm
Lilly's 29 yard SB sack
PFRA is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the history of professional football. Formed in 1979, PFRA members include many of the game's foremost historians and writers.
https://mail.profootballresearchers.org/forum/
https://mail.profootballresearchers.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4113
Trading Tarkenton to the Giants from 1967-71 cost the Vikings at least one and quite possibly two Super Bowl victories. I think with Tarkenton they might have beaten the Chiefs in Super Bowl IV or at least made it closer than 23-7, I'll say 23-17 Chiefs. There is no way Minnesota would have lost the 1970 playoffs had they had a healthy Fran Tarkenton, he would have won Super Bowl V as there was no truly dominating team and the Vikings already had one of the great defenses of all time which would have made them THE team. 1971 is also possible but not as likely as Dallas was dominating coming down the stretch, however it must be noted that the Cowboys beat the Vikings 20-12 in Minnesota with Gary Cuozzo at QB so I think Tark might have been able to pull that game out. If the Vikings had gotten past Dallas in the Divisional game with Tarkenton I think they would have beat the 49ers for the NFC title and then the Dolphins in the Super Bowl.BD Sullivan wrote:A competent quarterback during the last two years would likely have done the trick.jeckle_and_heckle wrote:It's amazing they didn't win a championship playing defense like that.JohnH19 wrote:No team, in my lifetime, will ever give up less than 10 points per game over a three season stretch like the 1969-71 Vikings.
Because.... ?jeckle_and_heckle wrote: Your hypothetical bit of fantasy would NOT be a "run from scrimmage."
I asked Bills statistician Mike Haim, and here is his response.Evan wrote:Just wondering if Tony Dorsett's 99-yard rush could be broken on a technicality, based on this hypothetical:
The Vikings have the ball on their own 1-yard-line. Matt Asiata takes a handoff, and plows forward to the 2-yard-line, but as he is being tackled, he recklessly but ingeniously laterals the ball backward to Cordarrelle Patterson, standing two yards deep in the end zone. Patterson makes the most of lots of players standing around thinking the play was over, and proceeds to run 102 yards with the lateral for a Vikings TD.
I believe Asiata would get credited with one rush for one yard, but would Patterson get credited with:
A. 99 yards rushing (from the original line of scrimmage)
B. 98 yards rushing (from the point where Asiata advanced the ball, but not where Patterson received it)
C. 102 rushing yards (from the point where Patterson received the lateral)
-- all without an actual statistical rushing attempt.