Page 4 of 4
Re: One conclusion is pretty plain
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2021 1:46 am
by rewing84
Historian43 wrote:Think they should go the baseball route of having seperate committees for seperate eras if they are only going to be looking at candidates from the 60s onwards. Given the late date of the Halls founding I think the lionshare of worthy candidates who've been denied are from before 1960 .
Id be in favor of that
Re: One conclusion is pretty plain
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2021 1:24 am
by JameisLoseston
I've long been on the record saying Dilweg/Lewellen have a perfectly solid pure-stats case for the HOF when compared to their contemporaries, but at this point I'm pretty sure they're not getting in. So my main focus right now would be guys like Gradishar, Kenny A, Billy Howton, even my main man Hennigan if they really feel like making me happy, who are more recent but still have bigger numbers than many contemporary HOFers at their positions.