Re: Your Unpopular Football Opinions
Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2024 6:42 pm
Very intriguing debate, these last few posts, on this Det/Clev 1950s stuff! Not as strong an inter-conference rivalry as Bears/Washington from a decade or so earlier, but better to me than '70s Steelers/Cowboys despite obvious biased stuff from myself!
This reminds me of the final scene of what I feel may, very well, be the Greatest one-season TV series of All-Time. The kind of one-season triumph that makes you so very sad that it only lasted one season (Season 2 would have been so Awesome). What 'Happy Days' or 'Sopranos' would have been seen as had it somehow wasn't picked up for a second season. The series I'm talking of is...'Freaks and Geeks'! PLEASE see if you haven't already! Eighteen episodes in which each one is better - more progressive - than the one prior! This especially goes for if you're a Detroit-fan!!
Anyways the character, Lindsay, is being sent-off by her family, via-bus trip, to a summer field trip that involves academics. Her younger brother's two friends suddenly show up to wish her goodbyes. One of them, Neal, had a crush on her the entire series thus far. He bought her chocolates. The other, Bill, didn't have such a crush on her at all so didn't get her anything; just wishing her a goodbye. Yet, Lindasy kisses BOTH goodbye before getting onboard the bus. As phrased, it didn't cost Bill a cent!
Well, sort-of reminds me of this! Browns of the '50s were more winningest, appeared in more title games, etc. Yet, the Lions had three World Championships! And so did Cleveland! And, yes, Detroit had their # all along as well!
Man, I've said it numerous times already in that the '57 Browns were like the '91 Lakers. Yes, Browns still had Paul Brown whilst LA still had Magic. No more Kareem (nor Pat Riley) and no more Otto though. Yes, '57 and '91 respectively SO different, and distant-enough, than the years prior.
Let's just say that Dallas, who loses 14-3 at the 'Burgh in Wk#9 and finishes 11-5 top-seed, actually makes it to Pasadena in January '80! And let's say that they, actually...BEAT PITTSBURGH!! Yup! Now BOTH finish the 1970s with three World Championships as well!! Yes, it'd mean that it'd be entertained that Big D wins the 'tie-breaker' due to they still being the more winningest team than the Steelers. And they still making the playoffs more times as well as appearing in more CCs along with more SBs...6 to 4! But the 'Burgh would have still beat them in the Big Game, 2-1, as Detroit prior to aforementioned '57 did vs Cleveland. Yes, it'd still be debate-enough, but would you seriously, unanimously, give Dallas the 'Team of the 1970s' tag??
Maybe had the Browns been in the NFL in '46 already, we as well as myself would be thinking totally differently. Their work in the '40s reeks of they likely being at their peak (man that '48 'jewel' of a squad). But we can never be completely sure.
And though rules-were-rules, everyone played by them, getting swept by Giants doesn't at all "taint" their '50 title. If NYG deserved it, then they simply complete the 'hat-trick' (heck, win at least one of the two that Clev DID win in the first place)! Just like the '67 Rams should have still went into wintry Wisconsin and did it again a couple weeks later (I'll ALWAYS respect the Pack more than the Rams in '67 because of that; if every playoff game has to be at home in order to be able to win a title...yeah)!
But Browns, despite 11-1 and beating Rams in LA by 15, still didn't get it done when they had to in the very end. And those '51 Rams, to me, were good overall at 8-4, Classic offense, but nothing special on defense thus making them the team that more-stronger and balanced Cleveland should have beaten handily (IMO the 2018 Rams, for their time/"adjusting inflation", were a stronger team than '51 up until the title game; again JMHO). Yet Browns did NOT finish to deal! Yes, close losses to Lions next two years (as Dallas lost close to Steelers), but a loss is a loss thus Cleveland played a little of a '90 Bills precursor with three-straight bride's maids finishes! So this adds illumination to the argument that they weren't really that "most-dominant" ever.
Amazing run! Paul and Otto are Rushmore guys indeed! But all I just said...
This reminds me of the final scene of what I feel may, very well, be the Greatest one-season TV series of All-Time. The kind of one-season triumph that makes you so very sad that it only lasted one season (Season 2 would have been so Awesome). What 'Happy Days' or 'Sopranos' would have been seen as had it somehow wasn't picked up for a second season. The series I'm talking of is...'Freaks and Geeks'! PLEASE see if you haven't already! Eighteen episodes in which each one is better - more progressive - than the one prior! This especially goes for if you're a Detroit-fan!!
Anyways the character, Lindsay, is being sent-off by her family, via-bus trip, to a summer field trip that involves academics. Her younger brother's two friends suddenly show up to wish her goodbyes. One of them, Neal, had a crush on her the entire series thus far. He bought her chocolates. The other, Bill, didn't have such a crush on her at all so didn't get her anything; just wishing her a goodbye. Yet, Lindasy kisses BOTH goodbye before getting onboard the bus. As phrased, it didn't cost Bill a cent!
Well, sort-of reminds me of this! Browns of the '50s were more winningest, appeared in more title games, etc. Yet, the Lions had three World Championships! And so did Cleveland! And, yes, Detroit had their # all along as well!
Man, I've said it numerous times already in that the '57 Browns were like the '91 Lakers. Yes, Browns still had Paul Brown whilst LA still had Magic. No more Kareem (nor Pat Riley) and no more Otto though. Yes, '57 and '91 respectively SO different, and distant-enough, than the years prior.
Let's just say that Dallas, who loses 14-3 at the 'Burgh in Wk#9 and finishes 11-5 top-seed, actually makes it to Pasadena in January '80! And let's say that they, actually...BEAT PITTSBURGH!! Yup! Now BOTH finish the 1970s with three World Championships as well!! Yes, it'd mean that it'd be entertained that Big D wins the 'tie-breaker' due to they still being the more winningest team than the Steelers. And they still making the playoffs more times as well as appearing in more CCs along with more SBs...6 to 4! But the 'Burgh would have still beat them in the Big Game, 2-1, as Detroit prior to aforementioned '57 did vs Cleveland. Yes, it'd still be debate-enough, but would you seriously, unanimously, give Dallas the 'Team of the 1970s' tag??
Maybe had the Browns been in the NFL in '46 already, we as well as myself would be thinking totally differently. Their work in the '40s reeks of they likely being at their peak (man that '48 'jewel' of a squad). But we can never be completely sure.
And though rules-were-rules, everyone played by them, getting swept by Giants doesn't at all "taint" their '50 title. If NYG deserved it, then they simply complete the 'hat-trick' (heck, win at least one of the two that Clev DID win in the first place)! Just like the '67 Rams should have still went into wintry Wisconsin and did it again a couple weeks later (I'll ALWAYS respect the Pack more than the Rams in '67 because of that; if every playoff game has to be at home in order to be able to win a title...yeah)!
But Browns, despite 11-1 and beating Rams in LA by 15, still didn't get it done when they had to in the very end. And those '51 Rams, to me, were good overall at 8-4, Classic offense, but nothing special on defense thus making them the team that more-stronger and balanced Cleveland should have beaten handily (IMO the 2018 Rams, for their time/"adjusting inflation", were a stronger team than '51 up until the title game; again JMHO). Yet Browns did NOT finish to deal! Yes, close losses to Lions next two years (as Dallas lost close to Steelers), but a loss is a loss thus Cleveland played a little of a '90 Bills precursor with three-straight bride's maids finishes! So this adds illumination to the argument that they weren't really that "most-dominant" ever.
Amazing run! Paul and Otto are Rushmore guys indeed! But all I just said...