Re: Ken Stabler VS Steve Young
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 12:51 pm
"The refs Rob Lytle'd an obvious fumble" ... nice term
PFRA is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the history of professional football. Formed in 1979, PFRA members include many of the game's foremost historians and writers.
https://mail.profootballresearchers.org/forum/
https://mail.profootballresearchers.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6732
There was a media buzz at that time that if the 49ers lost that game, Mariucci would have been fired, and Holmgren would have come back to San Francisco to be the HC. He was already on his way out anyway in Green Bay as I recall due to a power struggle with the front brass. Andy Reid also might not become coach of the Eagles, as he stated in his own words on the NFL Greatest Games segment "If Owens doesn't make that catch, then I probably don't become the Eagles head coach. I don't think they could have waited another week." That loss was basically the end of the Packers dominant period of the mid to late 90's. Reggie left, and Holmgren left. They wouldn't return to the playoffs for two more years. The game itself certainly did have big ramifications for both squads. Mariucci basically bought himself a few more years with that win over the Packers.Bryan wrote:I think that's a bit of an oversell. It was just a wild card game, the refs Rob Lytle'd an obvious Jerry Rice fumble that would have ended the game in the Packers' favor, and the Niners promptly lost the following week to the Falcons (Steve Young 1TD, 3 INT). The game had no greater impact, other than perhaps helping launch the HC 'career' of one of the dumbest coaches ever, Marty Mohrningweg. It was a nice throw by Young and an exciting play, but I'm not seeing any greater historical significance.Ness wrote:Steve Young's game-winning TD pass to Terrell Owens in the 1998 NFC Wild Card game is one of the hallmarks of NFL history, and a staple of NFL Films.
Actually if you look at the QBs that were in the playoffs around that time, Steve had one of the higher QB ratings with an extended sample size. Troy Aikman I think was only higher in the 90's. Don't think Elway, Moon, or Dan were. 49ers were also never one and done during that decade. You're right in that Steve only has one late-game playoff comeback, but quarterbacks in the playoffs that have multiple comebacks probably are the only ones with multiple rings, or more likely they were never behind in the first place. It's crazy hard to have multiple late game comebacks in one postseason, let alone in a career-worth. Especially in that era.Jay Z wrote:Young had the 1998 comeback against the Packers, that was his one playoff comeback.
Other than that and the 6 TDs in the Super Bowl, his performance in playoff games was underwhelming, disappointing from a rate standpoint.
A lot to unpack here. First, not a big fan of 'media buzz'. Mariucci had been with the Niners for two seasons and compiled records of 13-3 and 12-4. Not sure why any team would fire a coach after only two seasons when the guy has a 25-7 record. The reason Holmgren went to Seattle was he wanted total control of the football operation. I doubt Holmgren would 'go back' to SF to simply be a HC. The Niners would have had to fire not only their 25-7 HC in Mariucci, they also would have had to fire Dwight Clark and John McVay. I don't see the Niners making wholesale changes after a 12-4 season.Ness wrote:There was a media buzz at that time that if the 49ers lost that game, Mariucci would have been fired, and Holmgren would have come back to San Francisco to be the HC.
That would be an interesting angle if it came from the Philly management, but even then its purely speculative.Ness wrote:Andy Reid also might not become coach of the Eagles, as he stated in his own words on the NFL Greatest Games segment "If Owens doesn't make that catch, then I probably don't become the Eagles head coach. I don't think they could have waited another week."
This doesn't make any sense. After that alleged franchise-crushing loss to the Niners, the Packers would 'bottom out' at 8-8 then post 5 straight winning records with 4 straight 10+ win seasons. They wouldn't return to the playoffs for two 'more' years...OK? I'm guessing the departure of Mike Holmgren and Reggie White had more to do with the decline than the WC loss to the Niners. In subsequent years, Mariucci would post consecutive records of 4-12 and 6-10...and he still kept his job. So the idea is the Niners would fire Mariucci after a 12-4 season, but in reality they would keep Mariucci after a 4-12 season? The Niners had a bad year in 1999, but I would say that was more to do with Steve Young retiring due to concussions than the Niners winning the 1998 WC game. Is the implication that, had the Niners lost to GB, then Young wouldn't have gotten concussed in 1999?Ness wrote:" That loss was basically the end of the Packers dominant period of the mid to late 90's. Reggie left, and Holmgren left. They wouldn't return to the playoffs for two more years. The game itself certainly did have big ramifications for both squads. Mariucci basically bought himself a few more years with that win over the Packers.
My statement was factual. It was just a wild card game with minimal historic significance. The Niners won an exciting game, got stomped by the Falcons the next week, and the NFL continued forward. The majority of prominent moments in NFL history did not take place during insignificant WC games.Ness wrote:As for Young, yeah it was just a wild card game, but you can say that about any of the most prominent moments in NFL history
I guess you want to move the goalposts to a different galaxy....you start with the greatest play in NFL history, you incorrectly identify the year of The Drive, and then you end with a mention of Garrison Hearst. Who knew that NFL history had so many hallmarks?Ness wrote:As for Young, yeah it was just a wild card game, but you can say that about any of the most prominent moments in NFL history profiled on loop depending on how far one wants to place or move the goalposts.
"The Immaculate Reception was just a divisional game, and the Steelers got bounced the following week at home against Miami."
"The Drive was nice, but it's a bit of an oversell, since the Broncos got axed against the Redskins a week later."
"Garrison Heart's OT rumble was cool, but it was only opening day of the NFL season. Yawn."
You're not wrong. But the point is more that Young declined from his regular season performance and that contributed to the disappointing performance of his teams.Ness wrote:Actually if you look at the QBs that were in the playoffs around that time, Steve had one of the higher QB ratings with an extended sample size. Troy Aikman I think was only higher in the 90's. Don't think Elway, Moon, or Dan were. 49ers were also never one and done during that decade. You're right in that Steve only has one late-game playoff comeback, but quarterbacks in the playoffs that have multiple comebacks probably are the only ones with multiple rings, or more likely they were never behind in the first place. It's crazy hard to have multiple late game comebacks in one postseason, let alone in a career-worth. Especially in that era.Jay Z wrote:Young had the 1998 comeback against the Packers, that was his one playoff comeback.
Other than that and the 6 TDs in the Super Bowl, his performance in playoff games was underwhelming, disappointing from a rate standpoint.
You're right about 1995. I forgot. Not 1996 though. They beat the Eagles 14-0 in the wild card. Steve suffered messed up ribs in that game, and couldn't go the next week against the Packers in Lambeau. So it was Elvis Grbac, and that essentially nuked the 49ers chances.Brian wolf wrote:Sorry Ness, but the Niners were one and done in both 1995 and 1996 to Favre and GB, which makes that 98 win, sweeter for Young.