74_75_78_79_ wrote:What a read (and history, and education...)! So Yankees Stadium, to you, was strictly for baseball? Never seen a football game there so I'd be the last to know. New Stadium is fine but why did they have to tear old one down? Re-do it as they did mid-'70s (if Fenway is still going...). Not a Giants fan but wish that they would still share The New Stadium with the Yanks while the Jets and Mets still share the new Shea (and what was your take on the old one as a football stadium); and let (North) Jersey have their own (NJ-named) NFL team at the Meadowlands if possible. Watering holes along Route 1? Done some NE-road-tripping with friends in my day but have a feeling yours were even more intriguing. Already being familiar with the scenery (especially autumn sunset), a football game 'in the shadow' of Coogan's Bluff - I'll take your word - would have to be the best football ticket in NYC, comparable to Harvard. Baseball Giants' move to the West (along with A's to Oaktown) will always seem to be overshadowed by the Dodgers' move as well as their time in the City. FWIW would like to check out a Pinstripe Bowl at the New Stadium some year, especially if it involves Penn St. Wonder if the new Shea will ever host football games if they haven't already? A fellow-Yankee-fan told me a while back that he thinks the new Shea is better than the New Stadium.
The old Yankee Stadium was really crappy. I was in it one time. The concourses were exceedingly small. The seat I was in was close to the field behind first base. The seat was pointed towards center field. I had to sit sideways to view the pitching.
Shea Stadium was built much later and the concourses were larger. There was a little bit more room to walk. Both Yankee Stadium and Shea Stadium were pieces of crap compared to the stadiums that have been built in the past 20 years. Both the Yankees and Mets were due for new ballparks.
Veterans Stadium and RFK Stadium (I was in each of them for baseball games only) also were pretty rotten. The Oakland Coliseum (also was only there for baseball) was slightly better than Veterans and RFK. The men's room I went into had a trough.
"New Shea" is actually called Citi Field. It would never host an NFL game unless there were multiple disasters and either the Giants or Jets had no choice but to play there. If something happened to the antiseptic pile of crap that is MetLife Stadium, I would assume the Giants or Jets would play at Rutgers Stadium (or whatever they call it) on a temporary basis. If that was not available, then maybe Yankee Stadium would be the next stop. However, it doesn't meet the league's maximum capacity requirement.
I have not been to the new Yankee Stadium and don't want to go to it, so maybe it is not totally fair for me to say Citi Field is better, but I haven't heard anyone say Yankee Stadium is better than Citi Field. A lot of the complaints about MetLife Stadium (too big, antiseptic, bland) are also made about Yankee Stadium. Citi Field, on the other hand, doesn't get many complaints. There are seats in the outfield that are obstructed by signs and overhangs. I sat in nosebleeds seats in left field in what was maybe the 4th game in the history of the ballpark. I was able to see maybe a third of the field. On my next trip I made sure to get an unobstructed view seat. The other time I went I was in a luxury suite.