Any mention in this forum of the hof immediately evokes thoughts of Don Larsen and his Perfect Game.
It is easy to envision the likes of Peter King and the languid lemmings who ascribe to his meanderings
posing a question akin to that of the reporter who asked the big right-hander:
"Is that the best game you ever pitched?"
Wanna bet that guy was not at Yankee Stadium on December 30th of the year?
The HoF voting process
- oldecapecod11
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 8:45 am
- Location: Cape Haze, Florida
Re: The HoF voting process
"It was a different game when I played.
When a player made a good play, he didn't jump up and down.
Those kinds of plays were expected."
~ Arnie Weinmeister
When a player made a good play, he didn't jump up and down.
Those kinds of plays were expected."
~ Arnie Weinmeister
Re: The HoF voting process
I third that.Teo wrote:I second that. I believe it's the voters' responsability to know the most they can about the candidates for enshirinment. I believe it's neccessary to discuss them, as it does today, but not to "present" them.Reaser wrote:Forgot to say that I would also eliminate the 'presentation' part of the process. All voters would be expected to already know the players that they would be voting on.
We discussed the influence of presenters at length when Floyd Little was elected in 2010. I believe the fellow presenting Little's case emphasized some obscure statistic like Floyd's impressive yards gained after first contact statistic (anybody remember if that was it?). Does anyone know what a good YAFC stat looks like? What was the context? How does that number compare to guys that gained 10,000 yards more than Little and averaged 1 yard per carry more than Floyd's 3.9 in their career? That unknown statistic and the presenter's passion was enough to sway enough members to vote Floyd in. I feel like voters were bullied into voting for him by a guy yelling and banging his shoe on the table.
-
- Posts: 2413
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 1:28 pm
Re: The HoF voting process
Yeah, that is true, however, it is often considered that since the seniors committee voted Little out that he would get in anyway, but your point is right, the use of that stat likely DID help. I would have to look up YAC for RBJohnH19 wrote:I third that.Teo wrote:I second that. I believe it's the voters' responsability to know the most they can about the candidates for enshirinment. I believe it's neccessary to discuss them, as it does today, but not to "present" them.Reaser wrote:Forgot to say that I would also eliminate the 'presentation' part of the process. All voters would be expected to already know the players that they would be voting on.
We discussed the influence of presenters at length when Floyd Little was elected in 2010. I believe the fellow presenting Little's case emphasized some obscure statistic like Floyd's impressive yards gained after first contact statistic (anybody remember if that was it?). Does anyone know what a good YAFC stat looks like? What was the context? How does that number compare to guys that gained 10,000 yards more than Little and averaged 1 yard per carry more than Floyd's 3.9 in their career? That unknown statistic and the presenter's passion was enough to sway enough members to vote Floyd in. I feel like voters were bullied into voting for him by a guy yelling and banging his shoe on the table.
here is a career total, so put in his attempts and you have his career average of over 3.... seems high to me. But need to look that up
http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/minn ... cks-021016