Page 3 of 7
Re: Relocation
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:17 am
by Mark L. Ford
BD Sullivan wrote:Last time the Rams moved to Los Angeles was also on January 12...1946--exactly 70 years ago.

That's a remarkable coincidence.
http://archives.chicagotribune.com/1946 ... os-angeles
Re: Relocation
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 4:36 pm
by Steviek
A bit off topic, but I hope the Rams go back to their 1973-2000 era blue and yellow unis. To me, those symbolized the Los Angeles Rams.
Re: Relocation
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 4:50 pm
by BernardB
Steviek wrote:A bit off topic, but I hope the Rams go back to their 1973-2000 era blue and yellow unis. To me, those symbolized the Los Angeles Rams.
Probably depends on how old one is---the blue and white colors, I grew up watching, are the ones I associate most with the Rams and the most pleasing to my eye.
Re: Relocation
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:40 pm
by BD Sullivan
BernardB wrote:Steviek wrote:A bit off topic, but I hope the Rams go back to their 1973-2000 era blue and yellow unis. To me, those symbolized the Los Angeles Rams.
Probably depends on how old one is---the blue and white colors, I grew up watching, are the ones I associate most with the Rams and the most pleasing to my eye.
+1
Re: Relocation
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:48 pm
by Steviek
BernardB wrote:Steviek wrote:A bit off topic, but I hope the Rams go back to their 1973-2000 era blue and yellow unis. To me, those symbolized the Los Angeles Rams.
Probably depends on how old one is---the blue and white colors, I grew up watching, are the ones I associate most with the Rams and the most pleasing to my eye.
Very true point. Obviously my point of reference is the 70s - those heartbreak Rams teams that could never seem to get over the playoff hump, sans 1979.
Re: Relocation
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:55 pm
by SixtiesFan
Steviek wrote:A bit off topic, but I hope the Rams go back to their 1973-2000 era blue and yellow unis. To me, those symbolized the Los Angeles Rams.
At the time, I read they were supposedly intended to look something like their early 50's uniforms.
Re: Relocation
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 9:23 pm
by Andrew McKillop
A mildly amusing and overlooked tie to the NFL's L.A. past:
The NFL's original L.A. franchise, the Brick Muller-led Buccaneers in 1926, held their preseason practices at a location (Palisades del Rey) that eventually became LAX. The new stadium in Inglewood will be only a few miles away from that spot.
Re: Relocation
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:38 pm
by Ronfitch
LJP wrote:All options will apparently be discussed, so anything could happen.
The Onion: "NFL To Move All 32 Teams To Los Angeles"
http://www.theonion.com/article/nfl-to- ... NA:InFocus
Re: Relocation
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:47 pm
by LJP
Ha-ha-ha. Not quite sure why the Rams want to build a stadium on a fault line, that leaks Helium-3, but greed wins!
Whilst LA has the second largest TV market, you do actually want people to attend the games and not just watch on TV, otherwise there will be a local blackout. Can the Rams fill the 93,000+ seat LA Coliseum, or even their proposed 70,000+ seater?
http://www.theonion.com/graphic/traffic ... game-52169
Re: Relocation
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:53 pm
by Todd Pence
"Plus, the intricate L.A. highway system will cut team travel time by almost 25 percent,"
HA! HA! HA! HA!