Re: The Curious Case of Frankie Albert’s Extra-Point Conversions
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2025 10:37 pm
Bob Gill wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 12:39 pmYour guess about showmanship and improvisational style just about hits it on the nose. Y.A. Tittle, who shared the QB job with Albert in 1951 and '52, talked about this in his autobiography. A couple of quotes from the book:timcastelli wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 7:26 am Was Albert doing this to avoid blocked kicks, because he believed running or passing was a higher percentage play, or was it his showmanship and improvisational style? Does anyone have any insights or context into why Albert took this approach on extra points when he played with such accurate kickers, given the odds of success seem similar at best, and there is no greater reward?
What struck me most about Albert was his off-the-cuff approach to football. He had fun playing the game. He made it fun for us too. Frankie could always be expected to do the unexpected ....
You've got to get your work done in practice. Albert always did. But he enjoyed it. I mean, Frankie might just keep the ball on a bootleg when everyone expected him to do something else. He would fool everybody and hand the ball to a lineman or maybe a fellow who was just standing there watching the play.
.... Albert had other ways of keeping everyone guessing. One of them was throwing passes for extra points. This mind you, when all the time we have Gordy Soltau, one of the best place kickers in pro ball. That didn't faze Frankie. He would get down there to hold for Soltau on the conversion try. Then he'd straighten up and lob the ball to a defensive end or somebody and the guy would run it in for the point after touchdown.
It never made much sense. Soltau was a sure thing for the extra point. The defensive end wasn't a good risk to catch the ball. Still, this was Albert's way of having fun and making us enjoy football.
thanks, great info ...