Re: The Bears and their quarterbacks
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 1:40 pm
McMahon may have had "it" but he is in no way comparable to Namath in terms of talent and accomplishments.74_75_78_79_ wrote:Luckman IS obviously the best-ever-Bears QB! But McMahon has to be #2; if barring injuries, judging by his peak (his work with Philly, '91, should tell quite a tale as well).
McMahon and Namath similar - just one Ring each but so much more left on table that was never reached thanks to injuries. Both had swagger, leadership/huddle-presence, etc. They each had...'it'!