Page 2 of 2

Re: The Montana/Brady debate revisited.

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 7:12 pm
by Jeremy Crowhurst
Mark L. Ford wrote:
rhickok1109 wrote:I didn't even know there was a Montana-Brady debate, and I live in New England.
But if you lived out in the middle of nowhere....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady,_Montana
Don't know if it's really the middle of nowhere. After all, it's close to Manning, North Dakota....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manning,_North_Dakota

Re: The Montana/Brady debate revisited.

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 7:18 pm
by oldecapecod11
Such foolishness is not allowed in East Brady, Pennsylvania - the boyhood home of Jim Kelly.

And...

Wilson, North Carolina was chartered in 1849 which should squelch any debate as to whether or not the city was named for Russell Wilson following his exploits at North Carolina State University.

Re: The Montana/Brady debate revisited.

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 9:34 am
by 7DnBrnc53
JohnH19 wrote:
7DnBrnc53 wrote:I think that it's hard to say who is the GOAT. There have been multiple rule changes across eras, and players play better in one system than they do in another.

However, if I had to choose between them, I would pick Montana. All Brady has done has rode a bunch of lucky breaks, a weak division, and a superior coach to six Super Bowls and four World Championships.
Yeah, Brady's just been along for the ride. You kill me.

It could be six championships if not for two "unlucky" breaks. In truth, luck has nothing to do with any of the Patriots' SB results. It's guys making plays.

Brady - and Manning - belong on Mt. Rushmore with Montana, Unitas, Graham and Baugh...period.
And, if it wasn't for the Tuck Rule, Kasay's out of bounds kick, and Malcolm Butler, it might be one (or maybe none if 2001's title was the springboard for the success that NE has had since).

Re: The Montana/Brady debate revisited.

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 12:52 pm
by Jeremy Crowhurst
7DnBrnc53 wrote:
JohnH19 wrote:
7DnBrnc53 wrote:I think that it's hard to say who is the GOAT. There have been multiple rule changes across eras, and players play better in one system than they do in another.

However, if I had to choose between them, I would pick Montana. All Brady has done has rode a bunch of lucky breaks, a weak division, and a superior coach to six Super Bowls and four World Championships.
Yeah, Brady's just been along for the ride. You kill me.

It could be six championships if not for two "unlucky" breaks. In truth, luck has nothing to do with any of the Patriots' SB results. It's guys making plays.

Brady - and Manning - belong on Mt. Rushmore with Montana, Unitas, Graham and Baugh...period.
And, if it wasn't for the Tuck Rule, Kasay's out of bounds kick, and Malcolm Butler, it might be one (or maybe none if 2001's title was the springboard for the success that NE has had since).
As the saying goes, if the Queen had balls, she'd be the King.

Re: The Montana/Brady debate revisited.

Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:25 am
by Ronfitch
Jeremy Crowhurst wrote: As the saying goes, if the Queen had balls, she'd be the King.
Used to be a similar saying about Margaret Thatcher, except ... well, nevermind.

Re: The Montana/Brady debate revisited.

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 1:45 am
by JohnH19
7DnBrnc53 wrote: And, if it wasn't for the Tuck Rule, Kasay's out of bounds kick, and Malcolm Butler, it might be one (or maybe none if 2001's title was the springboard for the success that NE has had since).
...and if not for Manning to Tyree and Manningham it would be six.