Re: Harrison versus Tim Brown for HOF
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 12:22 pm
They both are, in my opinion.26554 wrote:Sharpe is a better candidate for a Sayers/Stephenson type exception than Terrell Davis.
PFRA is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the history of professional football. Formed in 1979, PFRA members include many of the game's foremost historians and writers.
https://mail.profootballresearchers.org/forum/
https://mail.profootballresearchers.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2784
They both are, in my opinion.26554 wrote:Sharpe is a better candidate for a Sayers/Stephenson type exception than Terrell Davis.
I'm on the fence. Along the same lines, there's also Jim Lachey.Bryan wrote:What do you think of Tony Boselli?26554 wrote:Sharpe is a better candidate for a Sayers/Stephenson type exception than Terrell Davis.
This goes along with the "shooting star" talk in the Davis vs. Bettis thread...Reaser wrote:I think Sharpe was the better player, so I agree. Though I don't think it should have to be an "exception" ... How long a player played shouldn't matter more than what a player did when he played. Somehow people think that way, seemingly average for 10 years would somehow be better than great for 5, I'll never understand that line of thinking. To each is their own, I guess. I just know I prefer the actual best football players (Sharpe, Easley, etc) to guys that played a couple years longer but weren't even in the same zip code in terms of level of play.26554 wrote:Sharpe is a better candidate for a Sayers/Stephenson type exception than Terrell Davis.