Are the 1990 Giants underrated?
-
ShinobiMusashi
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2025 3:13 pm
Re: Are the 1990 Giants underrated?
As somebody that didn't live through that 1990 season for being too young it has always been mind blowing to me to hear about them winning Super Bowl XXV being this huge upset. That doesn't make any sense to me considering who all was on that team, the fact that they had just won a Super Bowl 4 years earlier, reading about the build up and their defeat over the 49ers in the regular season and NFCCG, and living through all the Bills Super Bowl losses after that. That doesn't seem like an upset at all in fact I feel like they should have been the favorites over Buffalo going into XXV.
Re: Are the 1990 Giants underrated?
NY was a defense without an offense, an aging team that wanted to run out the clock and play not to loseShinobiMusashi wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2026 2:49 am As somebody that didn't live through that 1990 season for being too young it has always been mind blowing to me to hear about them winning Super Bowl XXV being this huge upset. That doesn't make any sense to me considering who all was on that team, the fact that they had just won a Super Bowl 4 years earlier, reading about the build up and their defeat over the 49ers in the regular season and NFCCG, and living through all the Bills Super Bowl losses after that. That doesn't seem like an upset at all in fact I feel like they should have been the favorites over Buffalo going into XXV.
That 7-3 SF game was basically a cure for insomnia
-
Brian wolf
- Posts: 4517
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:43 am
Re: Are the 1990 Giants underrated?
OJ had six effective seasons with 1982 taken out and was much more effective as a receiver than Earl Campbell. He was the first back to cross 10,000 yards WITHOUT making the HOF but has two rings and a SB MVP. Had he, and his teammate, Roy Green, not gotten injured, they both EASILY would have made the HOF.
-
SeahawkFever
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:18 am
Re: Are the 1990 Giants underrated?
I think a large part of it is because their starting quarterback Phil Simms was injured so they were playing with a backup quarterback in Jeff Hostetler.ShinobiMusashi wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2026 2:49 am As somebody that didn't live through that 1990 season for being too young it has always been mind blowing to me to hear about them winning Super Bowl XXV being this huge upset. That doesn't make any sense to me considering who all was on that team, the fact that they had just won a Super Bowl 4 years earlier, reading about the build up and their defeat over the 49ers in the regular season and NFCCG, and living through all the Bills Super Bowl losses after that. That doesn't seem like an upset at all in fact I feel like they should have been the favorites over Buffalo going into XXV.
Hostetler I’d say was pretty good for a backup, but the fact remains they were probably seen as an underdog because they started a backup quarterback.
-
Ten Minute Ticker
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2024 5:30 am
Re: Are the 1990 Giants underrated?
I think the 1990 Giants were better than the 1986 Giants by dint of having better depth at more positions. I also don’t think it was an upset at all. That might be NFL Films hagiography/inaccurate perception coming into play.
I will say I was glad the Giants beat the 49ers because I felt San Fran was overrated. They won eight games by a TD or less. Good for them for finding a way, but they were vulnerable to a correction.
I will say I was glad the Giants beat the 49ers because I felt San Fran was overrated. They won eight games by a TD or less. Good for them for finding a way, but they were vulnerable to a correction.
Re: Are the 1990 Giants underrated?
Ten Minute Ticker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2026 10:04 pm I think the 1990 Giants were better than the 1986 Giants by dint of having better depth at more positions.
What depth?
Re: Are the 1990 Giants underrated?
In 1990, they were. They weren't that far away from being 10-6. Their running game was falling apart that year, and never really recovered until 1992.I will say I was glad the Giants beat the 49ers because I felt San Fran was overrated
Besides the QB depth (being able to go to Hoss after Simms' injury), they did have good depth at RB with OJ, rookie Rodney Hampton, Lewis Tillman, and David Meggett.What depth?
On defense, they did have backups like OLB Johnie Cooks and S Dave Duerson, but they weren't too deep on that side of the ball besides that.
-
Brian wolf
- Posts: 4517
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:43 am
Re: Are the 1990 Giants underrated?
Defensively, the 49ers were still strong in 1990 but the offense just wasnt the same without a healthy Roger Craig. Rathman wasnt nearly the outlet receiver he had been for Joe in 1989 and Montana himself didnt spread the ball around like he normally did due to John Taylor being more nicked up.
As a play-caller, Mike Holmgren wasnt as sharp in 1990, trying to force the ball to Jerry Rice more and trying to compensate for the loss of Craig throughout the year. Even the offensive line, which had always been tough but undersized, didnt play to the level of 1989.
As a play-caller, Mike Holmgren wasnt as sharp in 1990, trying to force the ball to Jerry Rice more and trying to compensate for the loss of Craig throughout the year. Even the offensive line, which had always been tough but undersized, didnt play to the level of 1989.
Re: Are the 1990 Giants underrated?
As well as Gary Reasons and Leonard Marshall came on to start the last part of the year and the playoffs at DE7DnBrnc53 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2026 1:56 pm
Besides the QB depth (being able to go to Hoss after Simms' injury), they did have good depth at RB with OJ, rookie Rodney Hampton, Lewis Tillman, and David Meggett.
On defense, they did have backups like OLB Johnie Cooks and S Dave Duerson, but they weren't too deep on that side of the ball besides that.