John what do you think of the list how did I doJohnTurney wrote: ↑Wed Feb 11, 2026 11:49 amThanks for the compliment, but I wouldn't want Hall to acknowledge but was hoping to inspire some kind of panel to follow suit--the hall voters, a select group og them, maybe a pfra group of 50, something more than one's guy's opinion.Brian wolf wrote: ↑Tue Feb 10, 2026 10:56 pm John Turney knows about all these questionable choices. He helped create the All-Mid Decade teams on Pro Football Journal.
The HOF should acknowledge or honor/accept these teams. Thoroughly thought out and sensible ...
But, will tell you, there is work involved and for a group of 50 interested people would require a monitor to make sure punt returners are not mistaken for kick returners. Also, format-- taking into account 3-4s and 4-3s and so on--there would have to be debates before the debate, if you will.
would take a few months if any care were given to it, or even a group like ours would have some odd picks...I copped out by picking more than a 22-man roster...
Anyway, just random thoughts on the idea.
Most baffling All Decade choices
-
PFHOFlover
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2023 5:16 pm
Re: Most baffling All Decade choices
-
Brian wolf
- Posts: 4464
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:43 am
Re: Most baffling All Decade choices
I am more prone to the mid-decade teams Robert, but Baughan or Chuck Howley would have been fine for me. Like John listed, you want players to have had at least 5-6 or more outstanding seasons.
-
JohnTurney
- Posts: 2613
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 1:28 pm
Re: Most baffling All Decade choices
I agree with them. I would add Earl Campel for 1970s...seems like two years is too few.