Teams since 1941 ranked by "Luck" rating

7DnBrnc53
Posts: 1524
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 7:57 pm

Re: Teams since 1941 ranked by "Luck" rating

Post by 7DnBrnc53 »

In the luckiest list, I don't see the 1995 Chiefs and 1993 Bills.

Also, for the unluckiest, I agree with the 83 and 89 Bengals (they seemed to have bad luck the rest of the 80's after their stellar 1981 and 82 seasons) and 1995 Broncos.
User avatar
74_75_78_79_
Posts: 2702
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:25 pm

Re: Teams since 1941 ranked by "Luck" rating

Post by 74_75_78_79_ »

Strange Mackovic era in KC.

In '83 they finished 6-10, yet the #9 offense and #14 defense. +19 PD with 5.2 Y/P on offense, allowing 4.9 on D. Sure sounds like a candidate for "most unluckiest"! Not to mention, off-paper, tragically losing Joe Delaney before the season.

In '84 & '85 they finish 8-8 & 6-10 respectively whilst having the same exact Y/P on both offense and defense in each season.

Yet in '86, Mack's winning season/playoff year at 10-6, KC was 28th in offense and a negative Y/P (offense 4.2, defense 4.5)! Go figure. The finale win over the Steelers perhaps 'Exhibit A' to the strangeness of this campaign.


And I've mentioned those '12 Colts before...11-5, minus-30 PD, 5.2 Y/P on offense, but allowing 6.0 on D! 41-21, 35-9, and 59-24 blowouts at Chicago, at Jets, and at Pats respectively the main culprits. Yet, strangely, in their 1st Rd bounce-out in Baltimore, 24-9, they put up more 1st downs than the Ravens at 25 to 18, and had the ball for more than 37 minutes!
7DnBrnc53
Posts: 1524
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 7:57 pm

Re: Teams since 1941 ranked by "Luck" rating

Post by 7DnBrnc53 »

1981 New England Patriots
You Tuber CCC Productions has a series that counts down the most disappointing teams ever. He has the 81 Pats at 18th:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMf3073b3LI
1982 Kansas City Chiefs
The 1981 Chiefs would also be a good candidate for one of the unluckiest teams.
Last edited by 7DnBrnc53 on Thu Oct 09, 2025 10:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
CSKreager
Posts: 874
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 8:13 pm

Re: Teams since 1941 ranked by "Luck" rating

Post by CSKreager »

No 2003 Panthers?
SeahawkFever
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:18 am

Re: Teams since 1941 ranked by "Luck" rating

Post by SeahawkFever »

CSKreager wrote: Thu Oct 09, 2025 10:21 pm No 2003 Panthers?
By my count there are 378 teams since 1941 with a higher luck rating than the 2003 Panthers including the Patriots, Bears, Chiefs, and Bengals in the same season.

The Cowboys had the same favorable margin of luck by the metric.
CSKreager
Posts: 874
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 8:13 pm

Re: Teams since 1941 ranked by "Luck" rating

Post by CSKreager »

SeahawkFever wrote: Sat Oct 11, 2025 2:26 am
CSKreager wrote: Thu Oct 09, 2025 10:21 pm No 2003 Panthers?
By my count there are 378 teams since 1941 with a higher luck rating than the 2003 Panthers including the Patriots, Bears, Chiefs, and Bengals in the same season.

The Cowboys had the same favorable margin of luck by the metric.
Carolina won 9 regular season games by 8 points or less
SeahawkFever
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:18 am

Re: Teams since 1941 ranked by "Luck" rating

Post by SeahawkFever »

CSKreager wrote: Sun Oct 12, 2025 12:40 am
SeahawkFever wrote: Sat Oct 11, 2025 2:26 am
CSKreager wrote: Thu Oct 09, 2025 10:21 pm No 2003 Panthers?
By my count there are 378 teams since 1941 with a higher luck rating than the 2003 Panthers including the Patriots, Bears, Chiefs, and Bengals in the same season.

The Cowboys had the same favorable margin of luck by the metric.
Carolina won 9 regular season games by 8 points or less
They did, but their record relative to the league isn’t quite as far off from their stats relative to the league when compared to the other teams I mentioned were (as far as record outperforming statistical dominance).

2003 Patriots in particular had the best record in the NFL at 14-2, but had eight wins of eight points or less, and one 31 point loss (they showed up as only ninth by score percentage; Carolina by contrast shows up as right behind them by the metric but has the seventh best record so not as huge an overperformance).
Post Reply