We would have to dissolve the 501(c)(3). Our definition is based on the fact that a certain percentage of our revenue is from memberships. We would also have to dissolve the corporation for the same reason. We would then have to incorporate under a different definition to protect the organization.John Grasso wrote:Especially as we have legally been defined as a "not-for-profit" entity.Bob Gill wrote:
I tend to agree with this. I don't think making a profit should be a goal of the PFRA, ...
I am also against getting into fantasy sports. The market is flooded with fantasy "experts." What would set us apart from the companies like ESPN and the NFL, who spend a hell of a lot more money each year that we will ever have on fantasy? You would have to have better "stats," better "experts" and the like.
What makes the PFRA unique is that we fill a niche that hardly exists out there: True football historians. We know that pro football existed before Super Bowl I. We know that the "greatest of all-time" does not mean "the greatest of my recent memory." We delve into topics unknown to most, and present them in a way that is informative and enjoyable to read. I do not want to see the PFRA lose course and get away from what makes us special. Now, that does not mean that we cannot work on expanding. I think that I have outlined a few ways in which we can do that, and others here have also expressed ways that we can do that without losing what makes us unique.