Pre-’94 NFL games you wish had the 2-pt-conv in-effect
- Todd Pence
- Posts: 755
- Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 9:07 am
Re: Pre-’94 NFL games you wish had the 2-pt-conv in-effect
The World Football League made the two point conversion mandatory, IIRC
-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 4:57 pm
Re: Pre-’94 NFL games you wish had the 2-pt-conv in-effect
Actually, what they had was a variation called the "action point", where the touchdown was worth 7 points rather than 6, and an extra point could be scored either by running or passing the ball to the end zone. Similar concept to getting 8 points out of a TD and a conversion attempt, but there was no choice of whether to kick for 1 or run/pass for 2, because conversions in the WFL could not be kicked.
Re: Pre-’94 NFL games you wish had the 2-pt-conv in-effect
Never liked it. Still don't but have gotten used to it.
Though I don't mind the defense being able to score 2 on that play either. Basically two points are up for grabs on the play and both teams can claim them by doing several things
I believe the NFL thought they'd have more coaches going for 2 trying to get creative and surprise the other team and doing it in attempt to steal a point. But that almost never happens
Also I feel as though it cheapens comebacks and unfairly punishes teams that have played well most of the game. If you're holding a 16 point lead later in the game you shouldn't be able to lose that on just two possessions
And the play itself is so hard to defend especially in todays all offense league. It takes place from the 2 when it really should be from the 5
Though I don't mind the defense being able to score 2 on that play either. Basically two points are up for grabs on the play and both teams can claim them by doing several things
I believe the NFL thought they'd have more coaches going for 2 trying to get creative and surprise the other team and doing it in attempt to steal a point. But that almost never happens
Also I feel as though it cheapens comebacks and unfairly punishes teams that have played well most of the game. If you're holding a 16 point lead later in the game you shouldn't be able to lose that on just two possessions
And the play itself is so hard to defend especially in todays all offense league. It takes place from the 2 when it really should be from the 5
-
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 8:57 am
Re: Pre-’94 NFL games you wish had the 2-pt-conv in-effect
I agree with you entirely.sheajets wrote:Never liked it. Still don't but have gotten used to it.
Though I don't mind the defense being able to score 2 on that play either. Basically two points are up for grabs on the play and both teams can claim them by doing several things
I believe the NFL thought they'd have more coaches going for 2 trying to get creative and surprise the other team and doing it in attempt to steal a point. But that almost never happens
Also I feel as though it cheapens comebacks and unfairly punishes teams that have played well most of the game. If you're holding a 16 point lead later in the game you shouldn't be able to lose that on just two possessions
And the play itself is so hard to defend especially in todays all offense league. It takes place from the 2 when it really should be from the 5
Re: Pre-’94 NFL games you wish had the 2-pt-conv in-effect
Chiefs/Oilers 1993 playoffs
After KC went up 21-13, Houston got a touchdown but had to kick the XP instead of a chance to tie the game at 21-21
If they tied it…… who knows?
After KC went up 21-13, Houston got a touchdown but had to kick the XP instead of a chance to tie the game at 21-21
If they tied it…… who knows?
-
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 8:04 pm
Re: Pre-’94 NFL games you wish had the 2-pt-conv in-effect
The argument against the 2 point conversion when it was legalized in 1958 for college football was this. Suppose a team dominates a game and leads 7-0. 10-3 or 14-7. The team trailing scores a lucky touchdown and wins with a 2 point conversion.rhickok1109 wrote:I agree with you entirely.sheajets wrote:Never liked it. Still don't but have gotten used to it.
Though I don't mind the defense being able to score 2 on that play either. Basically two points are up for grabs on the play and both teams can claim them by doing several things
I believe the NFL thought they'd have more coaches going for 2 trying to get creative and surprise the other team and doing it in attempt to steal a point. But that almost never happens
Also I feel as though it cheapens comebacks and unfairly punishes teams that have played well most of the game. If you're holding a 16 point lead later in the game you shouldn't be able to lose that on just two possessions
And the play itself is so hard to defend especially in todays all offense league. It takes place from the 2 when it really should be from the 5
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 2:46 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
- Contact:
Re: Pre-’94 NFL games you wish had the 2-pt-conv in-effect
1983 Cowboys-Redskins Week 1. Washington trailed 31-23 and scored a last-second touchdown which turned out to be meaningless. Mark Moseley, 1982 MVP, earlier missed and it came back to haunt the 'Skins. Of course, that game is better known as the game Howard Cosell said something bad.
-
- Posts: 3443
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:43 am
Re: Pre-’94 NFL games you wish had the 2-pt-conv in-effect
Had John Unitas gotten the Colts into the endzone at the 3:19 mark and had the chance to try for two points, instead of the game-chosen extra point, Super III might have had a finish for the ages ... IF they convert ...
Re: Pre-’94 NFL games you wish had the 2-pt-conv in-effect
1990 Broncos at Bills (when Buffalo famously scored 3 touchdowns in 77 seconds)
At 29-21, Denver got a late touchdown.
If there was a 2PC, either they miss and we still get that onside kick attempt
But if Denver tied it……. Considering how important that game was for Buffalo would they have been able to win?
Heck if Denver wins maybe Buffalo never realizes their potential and Miami or the Raiders are the AFC team in SB XXV
At 29-21, Denver got a late touchdown.
If there was a 2PC, either they miss and we still get that onside kick attempt
But if Denver tied it……. Considering how important that game was for Buffalo would they have been able to win?
Heck if Denver wins maybe Buffalo never realizes their potential and Miami or the Raiders are the AFC team in SB XXV
Re: Pre-’94 NFL games you wish had the 2-pt-conv in-effect
I have no issue with the 2pt conversion but honestly I didnt think the game really needed it in 1993 either. Certainly makes for some incredible comebacks that perhaps wouldn't have happened before (though that doesnt mean the right...or deserving team would've won) it adds a