JohnR wrote:The goalpost placement has to take the cake. It's not as if people were unaware you could place them at the back of the EZ and still kick FGs. What a hazard! The tuning fork design set back a few feet was a concession that yes, our continuance of this is dumb but it's the way we've always done it.
I completely disagree about this one. The NFL started with the goals on the goal line, but moved them to the back line in 1927 -- and field goal kicking fell off a cliff. After leaguewide totals of more than 60 field goals each season in 1925 and '26, the WHOLE NFL kicked 23 in 1927. And it got worse. That was followed by SEVEN in 1928, 15 in 1929, and SIX in 1930, again in 1931, and again in 1932. So no, in fact the kickers of that time COULDN'T kick field goals with the posts at the back of the end zone, and the reduction in scoring was crippling offenses and fueling more and more tie games, which reached a high of TEN in 1932, when more than one out of every three games ended in a tie. The move was pretty much a disaster for the NFL.
Then they moved the goal posts back to the goal line in 1933, and voila: Field goals went up to 36 (a 500% increase) and ties fell to five in 31 games, or about one in six -- half of the previous rate.
So no, the goal post placement at the goal line was absolutely NOT a dumb idea, but moving them back to the end line in 1927 was a really dumb one. And moving them back to the goal line was a great idea, one of the key changes in 1933 that put the NFL on the track to mainstream popularity.