One-hit wonder teams

conace21
Posts: 989
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 10:08 am

Re: One-hit wonder teams

Post by conace21 »

The 1998 Atlanta Falcons. They had squeaked into the playoffs in 1995, but that was with a different coach and quarterback.

Possibly the 1998 Jets as well, although they did make the playoffs three years later.
JWL
Posts: 1230
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 12:35 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: One-hit wonder teams

Post by JWL »

conace21 wrote:The 1998 Atlanta Falcons. They had squeaked into the playoffs in 1995, but that was with a different coach and quarterback.

Possibly the 1998 Jets as well, although they did make the playoffs three years later.
If you want to be a hard marker I guess you can include the '98 Jets here on account of them not making the playoffs the year before and the year after. The Jets did go 17-15 in those seasons.
JWL
Posts: 1230
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 12:35 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: One-hit wonder teams

Post by JWL »

sluggermatt15 wrote:The 2016 Raiders (12-4). Jack Del Rio's second year. Raiders hadn't had a winning year since 2002. They went to the wild card round, losing at Houston, 27-14. Oakland regressed to 6-10 in 2017 and 4-12 last season, 2018.
The highlight of the 2017 Raiders season was calling a timeout to set up a field goal in the waning moments of a blowout in Week 2. It was all downhill from there.
BD Sullivan
Posts: 2318
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 1:30 pm

Re: One-hit wonder teams

Post by BD Sullivan »

conace21 wrote:The 1998 Atlanta Falcons. They had squeaked into the playoffs in 1995, but that was with a different coach and quarterback.
As noted before, there are plenty of Atlanta teams that would fit this category, since they could never put together back-to-back solid seasons.
7DnBrnc53
Posts: 1489
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 7:57 pm

Re: One-hit wonder teams

Post by 7DnBrnc53 »

ChrisBabcock wrote:2007 Browns
Don't forget the 2002 Browns as well. That may have been one of the worst playoff teams ever.
BD Sullivan
Posts: 2318
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 1:30 pm

Re: One-hit wonder teams

Post by BD Sullivan »

7DnBrnc53 wrote:
ChrisBabcock wrote:2007 Browns
Don't forget the 2002 Browns as well. That may have been one of the worst playoff teams ever.
Those 2007 Browns won 10 games (narrowly missing the playoffs) after going 19-45 the previous four years. Beginning the next year, they compiled a sparkling 38-122 record over the next decade.
JohnH19
Posts: 935
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 6:18 pm

Re: One-hit wonder teams

Post by JohnH19 »

BD Sullivan wrote:
7DnBrnc53 wrote:The 1970 Lions would make the playoffs at 10-4 (losing to Dallas 5-0 in the divisional round). Their next playoff berth during a non-strike year: 1991.

Why did that team fail to make the playoffs the next few years? They did have a fairly talented squad. Was it coaching (they did seem to have some turnover there)?
In 71, they were 4-1 prior to the game in which Chuck Hughes died, but they were still tied for the WC at 7-3-1 after beating KC on Thanksgiving. However, they lost at home to the 3-7-1 Eagles, then dropped their last two games at Minnesota and SF.

in 72, they were tied for the division lead at 7-4 after beating the Jets on Thanksgiving. Unfortunately, they got drilled by the Packers the following weeks and then inexplicably ended up in a tie on the road against the 3-9-1 Bills, which ended their playoff hopes.

Joe Schmidt quit after the 72 season and never returned to coaching.
The 1969 Lions finished 9-4-1 so they had winning records for four straight seasons. The '71 team was picked to go to the Super Bowl by some prognosticators. I have one magazine that had them playing the Jets in SB 6.
SixtiesFan
Posts: 892
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 8:04 pm

Re: One-hit wonder teams

Post by SixtiesFan »

JohnH19 wrote:
BD Sullivan wrote:
7DnBrnc53 wrote:The 1970 Lions would make the playoffs at 10-4 (losing to Dallas 5-0 in the divisional round). Their next playoff berth during a non-strike year: 1991.

Why did that team fail to make the playoffs the next few years? They did have a fairly talented squad. Was it coaching (they did seem to have some turnover there)?
In 71, they were 4-1 prior to the game in which Chuck Hughes died, but they were still tied for the WC at 7-3-1 after beating KC on Thanksgiving. However, they lost at home to the 3-7-1 Eagles, then dropped their last two games at Minnesota and SF.

in 72, they were tied for the division lead at 7-4 after beating the Jets on Thanksgiving. Unfortunately, they got drilled by the Packers the following weeks and then inexplicably ended up in a tie on the road against the 3-9-1 Bills, which ended their playoff hopes.

Joe Schmidt quit after the 72 season and never returned to coaching.
The 1969 Lions finished 9-4-1 so they had winning records for four straight seasons. The '71 team was picked to go to the Super Bowl by some prognosticators. I have one magazine that had them playing the Jets in SB 6.
I recall a Sport Special during the 1970 season on the Detroit Lions titled "The Coming Together of a Pro Football Team." The Lions were ready to go to the Super Bowl, according to Sport Magazine, due to drafting well and most starters at their peak. In 1970, the Lions started fast, slumped to 5-4, then won their last 5 to finish 10-4 with the Wildcard spot. They lost to the Cowboys 5-0.
Post Reply