I agree that Brazile is an 'odd' choice given the PFHOF's track record, but I don't really agree with the "this defense had X many of HOFers, they should be better" line of thinking. IMO, that's very similar to "this team won X many titles, so they need X many HOFers". In Brazile's case, if you are counting him amongst the HOFers on those Oilers teams, then you have three guys who are all borderline (IMO) HOF selections in Culp, Bethea & Brazile, discounting that the other defensive spots are manned by odds-and-ends guys like Mike Reinfeldt, Teddy Washington, Andy Dorris, etc., and then half-expecting the Oiler teams to perform better defensively than Pittsburgh, Dallas, LA.JohnTurney wrote:http://www.footballperspective.com/robe ... e-nominee/
To me, if you are going to do this exercise with Brazile, then you should really be looking at Culp. In addition to Houston's underperforming defense, he was part of a KC defense that had 5 HOFers (and possibly a 6th with Johnny Robinson), and from 1970-1974 you have Pts/Yds rankings of 8/6, 5/7, 13/15, 5/7, 21/25 with only a lone divisional playoff loss.