Steve Atwater is unlikely to get in the Pro Football HOF anytime soon, since the voters seemed to have soured on him this year after being a finalist last year, but do all of you feel he has a chance to get in soon?
Atwater was a had a very unique, hard-hitting defense, and set some Broncos defensive records, but the fact that safeties aren't looked at very strongly to the HOF voters definitely has hurt his chances.
I doubt he will get in as a Modern-Era candidate, personally, but I think he may get in 20 years from now as a Senior Candidate.
Steve Atwater: Canton or Nay?
-
- Posts: 624
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2015 4:57 pm
Re: Steve Atwater: Canton or Nay?
IMO this is a very interesting argument.
Atwater's career stats are Top 10 for safeties of all-time. His awards speak volumes, too. If you look at rankings of greatest safeties of all-time, Atwater is Top 10 on at least a few of those lists:
http://www.nbcsports.com/greatest-safeties-nfl-history
http://www.cheatsheet.com/sports/the-10 ... ?a=viewall
http://www.trendingtoplists.com/top-15- ... fl-history
So, given belief he is one of the best ever at his position, Atwater ought to be in the HOF. I share the belief that only the best players EVER to play professional football in the NFL deserve such honors. BUT I think he didn't get in isn't because writers, fans, historians, et. al don't believe Steve Atwater is one of the best ever, rather, it's because who he was going up against for election. Some of the other candidates may have been more deserving. I think eventually if Brian Dawkins, Rodney Harrison, and Troy Polamalu are elected, and I have no doubt they will, Atwater will be too. Opinions could be shared that voters want to get other players in sooner or quicker. Atwater may not be one of them.
Atwater's career stats are Top 10 for safeties of all-time. His awards speak volumes, too. If you look at rankings of greatest safeties of all-time, Atwater is Top 10 on at least a few of those lists:
http://www.nbcsports.com/greatest-safeties-nfl-history
http://www.cheatsheet.com/sports/the-10 ... ?a=viewall
http://www.trendingtoplists.com/top-15- ... fl-history
So, given belief he is one of the best ever at his position, Atwater ought to be in the HOF. I share the belief that only the best players EVER to play professional football in the NFL deserve such honors. BUT I think he didn't get in isn't because writers, fans, historians, et. al don't believe Steve Atwater is one of the best ever, rather, it's because who he was going up against for election. Some of the other candidates may have been more deserving. I think eventually if Brian Dawkins, Rodney Harrison, and Troy Polamalu are elected, and I have no doubt they will, Atwater will be too. Opinions could be shared that voters want to get other players in sooner or quicker. Atwater may not be one of them.
-
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 7:09 am
Re: Steve Atwater: Canton or Nay?
I think Steve Atwater (2/8/90s) is eminently HoF qualified. His falling out of the finalist pool this year isn't going to help him, but he's not out of the picture. He has seven eligible years left, and if all of Lynch, Dawkins, Reed, and Polamalu get elected (and I think they will, maybe quickly -- Dawkins next year after a years wait, Reed in 2019 as a very likely first ballot type, Polamalu in 2020 as the best first time candidate by a good bit), he's got a good chance of making it back in the finals with a couple years to spare. I know, I know, the HoF doesn't like safeties, but the Dawkins/Reed/Polamalu trio may get special treatment and that will help if so.
If he falls into the Senior pool, it could be a long wait for him. Hopefully that doesn't happen. But we'll see.
If he falls into the Senior pool, it could be a long wait for him. Hopefully that doesn't happen. But we'll see.
-
- Posts: 2413
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 1:28 pm
Re: Steve Atwater: Canton or Nay?
Been working on LBers and S career stats...will post this spring at some point...but Atwater seems to have a very good chance of getting in at some point. Think Dawkins this year, Reed the next, then...maybe Atwater's turn
-
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 7:09 am
Re: Steve Atwater: Canton or Nay?
I also don't think Rodney Harrison (3/2/none) has a HoF argument. Darren Sharper aside, when folks like Atwater, Leroy Butler (4/4/90s), Darren Woodson (4/5/none), Deron Cherry (3/6/80s), and Joey Browner (3/6/80s) can't get a sniff, I don't see a case for Harrison jumping ahead of them.
Last edited by bachslunch on Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 1:30 pm
Re: Steve Atwater: Canton or Nay?
Though he does have a weekly podium to make his case.bachslunch wrote:I also don't think Rodney Harrison (3/2/none) has a HoF argument. Darren Sharper aside, when folks like Atwater, Leroy Butler (4/4/90s), Darren Woodson (4/5/none), Deron Cherry (3/6/80s), and Joey Browner (3/6/80S) can't get a sniff, I don't see a case for Harrison jumping ahead of them.