Off the top of my head: Franco Harris, Tony Dorsett, Floyd Little, and John Riggins all played in the Super Bowl era and were never "the best" at their position. I would argue that Martin never was, but the position is debatable. (He won the rushing title by one yard over Shaun Alexander, who had more TD's and a better YPC average.)Reaser wrote:Here's the RB's who's careers overlapped (played at least one season during Bettis' career) who are in the HOF:conace21 wrote:He was never the best player at his position, but honestly, how many HOF players ever are?
Marcus Allen
Eric Dickerson
Marshall Faulk
Curtis Martin
Barry Sanders
Emmitt Smith
Thurman Thomas
All of them can say they were the best RB at one point. Next level, 6 of the 7 not only can say they were the best at their position but they can say they were the best player at any position at one point in their career (or at least we can say 6 of them won MVP/Player of the Year awards).
If we're in agreement Tomlinson will be in the HOF then you can add another name to that list and to the MVP list.
Terrell Davis has been a finalist so maybe for him, if ever gets in then that's another that was the best at his position and another that can say not only the best RB, not only the best offensive player, but the best player overall.
So the question, how many HOF players are ever the best at their position? Well, in this specific case the answer is all of them. Except Bettis, of course.
At QB: Aikman, Moon and Elway. (Montana was better than Elway was in 1987.)
WR: Biletnikoff, Joiner, Reed, Monk.
OL and defenders: that's a longer project that will have to wait.