Search found 110 matches
- Sat Jan 04, 2025 4:45 pm
- Forum: Football Obituaries
- Topic: 2024 Obituaries
- Replies: 148
- Views: 306174
Re: 2024 Obituaries
Jix Nix, receiver for the 49ers in 1950 and the 1951 Saskatchewan Roughriders before transitioning to a back judge for 10 seasons, died April 12 at the age of 95. Nix was the last living NFL official from the 1950s. He and the late Jim Tunney were the last living officials to work the weekend of the...
- Mon Dec 16, 2024 1:02 am
- Forum: Football Obituaries
- Topic: 2024 Obituaries
- Replies: 148
- Views: 306174
Re: 2024 Obituaries
Jim Tunney, a three-time Super Bowl referee and perennial Hall of Fame nominee, known simply as "the Dean of Referees," died December 12 at the age of 95.
https://www.footballzebras.com/2024/12/ ... ies-at-95/
https://www.footballzebras.com/2024/12/ ... ies-at-95/
- Thu Oct 31, 2024 3:21 am
- Forum: HOF and HOVG Talk
- Topic: BREAKING: contributor list down to 9
- Replies: 64
- Views: 44181
Re: BREAKING: contributor list down to 9
Shorty Ray never officiated in the NFL, however, so I wouldn't go that far to say he was the first official. The HOF liked to trot his name out to deflect the fact there was no official in the Hall prior to McNally. Ray was also, from what I can discern, incorrectly identified as the "superviso...
- Thu Oct 31, 2024 1:14 am
- Forum: HOF and HOVG Talk
- Topic: BREAKING: contributor list down to 9
- Replies: 64
- Views: 44181
Re: BREAKING: contributor list down to 9
Here's the graphic that was mentioned that really shows how out of step Canton is. And Naismith is actually up to 17 now.
- Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:46 pm
- Forum: HOF and HOVG Talk
- Topic: BREAKING: contributor list down to 9
- Replies: 64
- Views: 44181
Re: BREAKING: contributor list down to 9
What other officials do you think belongs in canton along with Art McNally the only one i can think of off my head would be Jim Tunney So I started this after I started to lobby hard for Art McNally, realizing that there were beat writers that could push their local interest, but there wasn't an eq...
- Wed Oct 30, 2024 6:49 pm
- Forum: HOF and HOVG Talk
- Topic: BREAKING: contributor list down to 9
- Replies: 64
- Views: 44181
Re: BREAKING: contributor list down to 9
I've been keeping an eye on the contributor category for some time with my coverage of officiating. It doesn't surprise me that no officials made it to the shortlist. Again. But this has to be the worst list they have ever put out for the category. It seems this will just play out as the seniors and...
- Sat Nov 04, 2023 5:31 pm
- Forum: Football Talk
- Topic: 1985 49ers
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6142
Re: 1985 49ers
The 1984 tiebreakers were head-to-head, conference W-L, common games W-L, net points in conference games, net points in all games, strength of schedule, and net touchdowns. With no H2H, the conference win percentage became the tiebreaker. Here are the tiebreakers broken down by years: https://www.qu...
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 6:58 pm
- Forum: Football Talk
- Topic: 2022 gamebook for suspended game
- Replies: 0
- Views: 15286
2022 gamebook for suspended game
When the NFL canceled the Bills-Chiefs game last year, the gamebook was actually published. A day or so after, they wiped all the stats off the GSIS and deleted the gamebook. I tried looking for any link to the old gamebook or reconstructing the URL, and have come up empty. I checked the 2022 PFRA g...
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 6:19 pm
- Forum: Football Talk
- Topic: Jets-VS-Giants history
- Replies: 25
- Views: 16197
Re: Jets-VS-Giants history
Regarding intercity rivalries in the same division or conference. This was addressed when there was a 3-team sweepstakes for a shared venue in the L.A. market between St. Louis, San Diego, and Oakland. It was essentially a guaranteed win for the Rams, because there was talk about a realignment if th...
- Wed Sep 27, 2023 12:35 pm
- Forum: Football Talk
- Topic: 50s Tackling Rule
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5224
Re: 50s Tackling Rule
The rule changed slightly right after the 1954 NFLCG (well, not counting the Pro Bowl). It still was not down by contact, as a grasp was required, but didn't require the grasp to be held through to the ground. So 7-7-1-1 (a) (3) and (4) were replaced with the following: (3) Touches ground with any p...